All issues
Housing / Building, buying and renting

How should housing policy change?

House prices have eased since 2021. Parties differ on public homes, rents and property tax.Cotality puts the typical home at 6.7 times household income in mid-2026, its long-term average and down from 9.8 in late 2021; the median rent Trade Me recorded was $625 a week in August 2026. Kāinga Ora and community housing providers run about 87,000 government-funded social homes, and 19,002 applicants were waiting on the Housing Register at 30 June 2026. Since 2023 the Government has replaced the RMA, set housing growth targets for councils, cut Kāinga Ora's building and funded community providers, restored landlords' interest deductions, brought back no-cause tenancy terminations and decided to raise social housing rents from 25% to 30% of income from April 2027. Parties differ on who builds social homes, planning rules and growth infrastructure, help for first-home buyers, rents and renters' rights, and tax on property.

Uneven evidence. Some parties' plans have more published costings or analysis than others. Read what was found

As at 18 October 2026, no independent costing of any party's housing plan was found, and no independent body was found to have compared all parties' plans. Published overviews come from a property investment adviser (realestate.co.nz), which leaves out Te Pāti Māori, saying it "hasn't released an official housing policy", although the party's housing page and January 2026 release set one out; a mortgage adviser (MyMortgage), which leaves out Opportunity; and housing writer Rosie Gallen, who covers all seven (Gallen). The Taxpayers' Union has costed the Greens' public homes, and the Government's own Budget figures cover National's record. The land tax and capital gains tax have older official analysis that predates the parties' plans; no independent evaluation of first-home loan or shared ownership schemes was found. Te Pāti Māori's manifesto housing section could not be opened, so its details come from the party's releases and one housing writer's account. Evidence sections reflect what has been published, not a judgement on the plans.

ViewDepth
Party order is random for each visitor. Tap a party's answer for its full breakdown and sources.Order

Bottom lines on this question

What a party has publicly said it must get, or won't accept, to form or support a government after the election. Only the party's own statements count, quoted with their source. Parties marked Bottom line below have one on that answer.

  • No bottom line on this question found: ACT, Green, Labour, National, NZ First, Opportunity, Te Pāti Māori (checked 17 Oct 2026)

Every party's bottom lines, on all issues

This question is split into smaller ones. Under each, parties giving the same answer are grouped together.

Public and community housing

5 of 7 parties give an answer

Government builds more public homes4 parties

  • Green

    Tens of thousands of public homes; the party says 35,000 is possible in five years.The policy document says "In the next 5 years, we could build 35,000 new public homes", using prefabrication and long-term building contracts.

  • Labour

    $2.9 billion for Kāinga Ora; Labour says 6,000 more social housing places.Labour says the $2.9 billion of capital goes to Kāinga Ora, with operating money for rent subsidies and running costs at Kāinga Ora and community providers, paid from future Budget allowances.

  • Opportunity

    Direct Kāinga Ora to build the mix of homes each region needs; no number given.The policy says this is so smaller towns can clear their housing waitlists; it does not say how many homes Kāinga Ora would build.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    More public housing investment, with half of new social homes for whānau Māori.Its January 2026 list includes "Radically increasing public housing investment" and allocating 50% of new social housing builds to whānau Māori; no number of public homes was found.

Fund community and Māori housing providers5 parties

  • Green

    Long-term funding and finance for councils, community providers and papakāinga on Māori land.Councils and community housing providers would get long-term funding and financing to scale up public housing, and Whai Kāinga Whai Oranga would fund more Māori housing.

  • Labour

    Raise the Crown guarantee on community housing bonds to $950 million.From its first Budget in 2027, which Labour says would cut providers' borrowing costs by about half a percentage point, alongside reliable funding so providers can plan ahead.

  • National

    From its record, a contestable Flexible Fund replaced a ring-fenced Māori housing fund.Budget 2024 funded 1,500 places through community housing providers, $200 million was brought forward for Māori housing, and Budget 2026 put $69.2 million into the contestable Flexible Fund, which replaced a ring-fenced Māori housing fund, for 1,800 to 2,250 more homes from 2028/29.

  • Opportunity

    Crown development finance for councils, community housing providers, iwi and builders.The Community Housing lending facility would be expanded for affordable or social housing tailored to local needs, and GST refunds to councils would also fund community housing.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    2,000 homes on papakāinga and direct funding for iwi and Māori housing providers.Its 2026 releases list building 2,000 houses on papakāinga and direct funding to iwi and Māori housing providers; Rosie Gallen reports the manifesto gives four years for the 2,000.

  • Not part of its policy: ACT, NZ First

Planning, building and infrastructure

6 of 7 parties give an answer

Make planning and building rules easier5 parties

  • ACT

    Exclude "purely spiritual and religious effects" from consenting, and ban required karakia.ACT would rule out refusing, restricting or adding conditions to a consent on a claim of spiritual harm alone, and would stop consents requiring what it calls a religious observance, such as karakia.

  • Green

    Planning law to allow more homes near transport; councils must enable enough housing.Councils would have to enable enough new housing to meet demand, including in existing urban areas, and barriers to Māori building on their own land would be removed.

  • National

    From its record, laws to replace the RMA, council growth targets, consent-free granny flats.The Planning and Natural Environment bills passed in September 2026; National's 2026 plan would implement them and let engineers sign off some commercial building work.

  • Opportunity

    Ten national planning zones and national pre-approval of proven prefabricated building systems.The zones would build on the Planning Bill with protections for productive farmland and heritage, councils could not ask for extra design reviews of certified systems, and Unit Titles Act changes would allow co-housing and papakāinga.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    Make it easier to build homes on Māori and ancestral land.Its housing page says it would make it easier to build homes on Māori and ancestral land; the sources read do not say which rules would change.

Change how growth infrastructure is required or paid for3 parties

  • National

    From its record, development levies planned and $400 million for councils per home consented.Bishop and Simon Watts decided in February 2025 to replace development contributions with levies, in a bill due in early 2027; payments to councils start on 1 April 2027.

  • NZ First

    Require roads, pipes and water to be in place before fast-track housing is approved.Developers would have to show the infrastructure exists, is funded and can be delivered, new housing panels could decline projects, and the immigration policy would allow major population growth only where infrastructure exists or is funded.

  • Opportunity

    Refund GST to councils on new builds meeting set standards, ring-fenced for infrastructure.The refund would apply to builds meeting standards such as Homestar 6+ or Passive House, and the party's infrastructure policy would also give councils grants and value capture tools.

  • Not part of its policy: Labour

First-home buyers

1 of 7 parties give an answer

Help first-home buyers1 party

  • National

    Raise the First Home Loan income cap to $300,000 for every buyer.More buyers could borrow with a 5% deposit through the Kāinga Ora scheme; National puts the cost at $4–6 million, from existing budgets.

  • Not part of its policy: ACT, Green, Labour, NZ First, Opportunity, Te Pāti Māori

Renters

5 of 7 parties give an answer
Which way each party would move this from current law. It doesn't show how far, or which is better.

Raise rents1 party

  • National

    From its record, social housing rents rise from 25% to 30% of income from 2027.Bishop and Louise Upston announced the change in Budget 2026, about $31 a week more on average for about 84,000 households, alongside higher Accommodation Supplement maximums.

Limit rent rises3 parties

  • Green

    Rent rises capped at 2% a year, new tenancies tied to the last rent.A Renters' Rights Bill would cap annual rent increases at no more than 2% and link a new tenancy's rent to what the previous tenants paid.

  • Labour

    Keep social housing rents at 25% of income, not the Government's planned 30%.Labour would retain current income-related rent settings for Kāinga Ora and community housing tenants, and has ruled out increasing the Accommodation Supplement as a substitute.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    Universal rent control; reported as a rent freeze, then limits on rises.Its January 2026 list includes "universal rent control"; Rosie Gallen reports the manifesto proposes "a rent freeze followed by limits on increases", with no level found in the sources read.

Strengthen renters' rights or rental standards3 parties

  • Green

    End no-cause terminations, certified Rental Warrant of Fitness, and a national landlord register.Tenants would get longer-term security without no-cause terminations, and rentals would need an independently certified warrant of fitness on top of stronger Healthy Homes Standards.

  • Opportunity

    Raise Healthy Homes standards for rentals over time; extend insulation grants to rentals.Rental standards would rise over time, including a right to charge EVs, and Warmer Kiwi Homes retrofits would cover eligible private rentals.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    Repeal "no cause evictions".Its January 2026 list includes "repealing no cause evictions", which landlords can now use on periodic tenancies with 90 days' notice.

  • Not part of its policy: ACT, NZ First

Tax on property

6 of 7 parties give an answer
Which way each party would move this from current law. It doesn't show how far, or which is better.

Tax less1 party

  • ACT

    End loss ring-fencing so landlords can set rental losses against other income.This lowers tax for landlords whose rentals make a loss; ACT's fiscal plan has "no new taxes", and Seymour says a capital gains tax "will hit people hard".

Keep current property taxes1 party

  • National

    No new taxes, so no capital gains tax; landlords' interest deductions restored.National has committed to no new taxes if re-elected; in government it restored interest deductibility and returned the bright-line test to two years.

Tax more4 parties

  • Green

    No mortgage interest deductions for landlords; 10-year bright-line test; wealth tax over $10m.Landlords could not deduct mortgage interest, investment homes sold within 10 years would be taxed, and property would count toward a 2.5% tax on net wealth over $10 million.

  • Labour

    28% tax on investment and commercial property gains after 1 July 2027.Labour says the family home and farms would be exempt and the revenue would go to health; it would make no further change to landlords' interest deductions.

  • Opportunity

    A yearly land value tax of 1.75% on urban land and 0.5% on rural land.Part of the wider Tax Reset that funds a Citizen's Income; it covers owner-occupied homes, with deferral for superannuitants and exemptions including social housing and communally owned Māori land.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    5% stamp duty on home sales, 2% vacant-house tax, 33% land-banking tax.From its tax plan, which exempts first-home buyers of homes under $1 million from the stamp duty; Rosie Gallen reports the manifesto would also repeal landlords' interest deductibility.

  • Not part of its policy: NZ First

Each party's whole answer, under the same headings for every party.

ACT

End landlords' loss ring-fencing; "exclude purely spiritual and religious effects" from consenting.ACT would end loss ring-fencing, the rule that stops landlords using rental losses to cut tax on their other income. Losses from the day the change takes effect could be offset; ACT says this would ease pressure on rents. It puts the cost at $264 million in year one, rising to $303 million in year four, inside a fiscal plan with "no new taxes". ACT would also "Exclude purely spiritual and religious effects from consenting" and "Ban compulsory religious observances in consent conditions". The biggest tradeoff: ACT says ending ring-fencing would ease pressure on rents, but it reduces government revenue and ACT has not estimated extra homes or lower rents; the consent change would stop consents requiring karakia, which ACT says developers must pay for, and would remove spiritual effects as a ground for decisions.

Public and community housing
Not part of its policy
Planning, building and infrastructure
Make planning and building rules easier. Exclude "purely spiritual and religious effects" from consenting, and ban required karakia.ACT would rule out refusing, restricting or adding conditions to a consent on a claim of spiritual harm alone, and would stop consents requiring what it calls a religious observance, such as karakia.
First-home buyers
Not part of its policy
Renters
Not part of its policy
Tax on property
Tax less. End loss ring-fencing so landlords can set rental losses against other income.This lowers tax for landlords whose rentals make a loss; ACT's fiscal plan has "no new taxes", and Seymour says a capital gains tax "will hit people hard".

Green

Tens of thousands of public homes, 2% rent rise cap, and no landlord interest deductions.The Greens would build "tens of thousands" of public homes, fund councils, community housing providers and papakāinga on Māori land, and require councils to enable enough new housing, including in existing urban areas. Rent rises would be capped at 2% a year, with a new tenancy's rent tied to the previous rent, no-cause terminations would end, and rentals would need an independently certified warrant of fitness. Landlords could no longer deduct mortgage interest, investment homes sold within 10 years would be taxed, and property would count toward a 2.5% tax on net wealth over $10 million. The biggest tradeoff: the party says renters would get capped rents and more public homes, while landlords with mortgages would pay more tax; ACT says rent caps would mean fewer rentals, and the party has published no cost for the public homes.

Public and community housing
Government builds more public homes. Tens of thousands of public homes; the party says 35,000 is possible in five years.The policy document says "In the next 5 years, we could build 35,000 new public homes", using prefabrication and long-term building contracts.
Fund community and Māori housing providers. Long-term funding and finance for councils, community providers and papakāinga on Māori land.Councils and community housing providers would get long-term funding and financing to scale up public housing, and Whai Kāinga Whai Oranga would fund more Māori housing.
Planning, building and infrastructure
Make planning and building rules easier. Planning law to allow more homes near transport; councils must enable enough housing.Councils would have to enable enough new housing to meet demand, including in existing urban areas, and barriers to Māori building on their own land would be removed.
First-home buyers
Not part of its policy
Renters
Limit rent rises. Rent rises capped at 2% a year, new tenancies tied to the last rent.A Renters' Rights Bill would cap annual rent increases at no more than 2% and link a new tenancy's rent to what the previous tenants paid.
Strengthen renters' rights or rental standards. End no-cause terminations, certified Rental Warrant of Fitness, and a national landlord register.Tenants would get longer-term security without no-cause terminations, and rentals would need an independently certified warrant of fitness on top of stronger Healthy Homes Standards.
Tax on property
Tax more. No mortgage interest deductions for landlords; 10-year bright-line test; wealth tax over $10m.Landlords could not deduct mortgage interest, investment homes sold within 10 years would be taxed, and property would count toward a 2.5% tax on net wealth over $10 million.

Labour

Give Kāinga Ora $2.9 billion for state houses, back community housing loans, tax property gains.Labour would give Kāinga Ora $2.9 billion over four years for state houses, and says Kāinga Ora and community housing providers would deliver at least 6,000 more social housing places. It would raise the Crown guarantee on community housing bonds to $950 million, which it says would cut providers' borrowing costs. It would keep social housing rents at 25% instead of the Government's planned rise to 30%. Labour says it opposed the return of no-cause terminations and "pledged to fix it", but has published no details. The biggest tradeoff: Labour says the state houses would be paid from future Budget allowances, but has not said how keeping rents at 25% would be funded; a 28% capital gains tax on investment and commercial property gains after 1 July 2027 would fund health; Labour says the tax would have little effect on rents, and National says it would reduce rental supply.

Public and community housing
Government builds more public homes. $2.9 billion for Kāinga Ora; Labour says 6,000 more social housing places.Labour says the $2.9 billion of capital goes to Kāinga Ora, with operating money for rent subsidies and running costs at Kāinga Ora and community providers, paid from future Budget allowances.
Fund community and Māori housing providers. Raise the Crown guarantee on community housing bonds to $950 million.From its first Budget in 2027, which Labour says would cut providers' borrowing costs by about half a percentage point, alongside reliable funding so providers can plan ahead.
Planning, building and infrastructure
Not part of its policy
First-home buyers
Not part of its policy
Renters
Limit rent rises. Keep social housing rents at 25% of income, not the Government's planned 30%.Labour would retain current income-related rent settings for Kāinga Ora and community housing tenants, and has ruled out increasing the Accommodation Supplement as a substitute.
Tax on property
Tax more. 28% tax on investment and commercial property gains after 1 July 2027.Labour says the family home and farms would be exempt and the revenue would go to health; it would make no further change to landlords' interest deductions.

National

Wider 5% deposit loans, no new taxes; from its record, RMA replacement laws passed.National's 2026 housing policy would raise the First Home Loan income cap, which lets buyers borrow with a 5% deposit through Kāinga Ora, to $300,000 for all applicants. It has promised no new taxes. From its record, its ministers passed RMA replacement laws, set council growth targets, allowed consent-free granny flats and plan development levies. Kāinga Ora's building was cut to about 1,500 new homes a year; ministers credit its turnaround plan and cost control with a $9.5 billion cut in forecast peak debt. A contestable fund replaced a ring-fenced Māori fund. Ministers restored landlords' interest deductions and no-cause terminations, and will raise social rents to 30% of income. The biggest tradeoff: more buyers on higher incomes could use 5% deposits, which National puts at $4–6 million and says helps people who can afford a mortgage but not a 20% deposit; critics say it adds demand without adding homes.

Public and community housing
Fund community and Māori housing providers. From its record, a contestable Flexible Fund replaced a ring-fenced Māori housing fund.Budget 2024 funded 1,500 places through community housing providers, $200 million was brought forward for Māori housing, and Budget 2026 put $69.2 million into the contestable Flexible Fund, which replaced a ring-fenced Māori housing fund, for 1,800 to 2,250 more homes from 2028/29.
Planning, building and infrastructure
Make planning and building rules easier. From its record, laws to replace the RMA, council growth targets, consent-free granny flats.The Planning and Natural Environment bills passed in September 2026; National's 2026 plan would implement them and let engineers sign off some commercial building work.
Change how growth infrastructure is required or paid for. From its record, development levies planned and $400 million for councils per home consented.Bishop and Simon Watts decided in February 2025 to replace development contributions with levies, in a bill due in early 2027; payments to councils start on 1 April 2027.
First-home buyers
Help first-home buyers. Raise the First Home Loan income cap to $300,000 for every buyer.More buyers could borrow with a 5% deposit through the Kāinga Ora scheme; National puts the cost at $4–6 million, from existing budgets.
Renters
Raise rents. From its record, social housing rents rise from 25% to 30% of income from 2027.Bishop and Louise Upston announced the change in Budget 2026, about $31 a week more on average for about 84,000 households, alongside higher Accommodation Supplement maximums.
Tax on property
Keep current property taxes. No new taxes, so no capital gains tax; landlords' interest deductions restored.National has committed to no new taxes if re-elected; in government it restored interest deductibility and returned the bright-line test to two years.

NZ First

Require roads, pipes and water to be in place before fast-track housing is approved.NZ First would change fast-track law so housing developments are approved only after the roads, pipes, water, wastewater and other services they need are approved. Developers would have to show the infrastructure exists, is funded and can be delivered; councils would advise on network capacity; new expert panels for housing could decline projects; listed projects that have not applied by the end of 2028 would lose priority access; and the Minister for Housing would make housing referral decisions. NZ First has not published a cost, a start date or who would pay for infrastructure that is missing. The biggest tradeoff: NZ First says making funded infrastructure a condition of approval would protect existing communities from unfunded growth costs; National's Chris Bishop says the requirement is already in law, and Waatea's Matthew Tukaki warns of possible barriers for Māori housing developments.

Public and community housing
Not part of its policy
Planning, building and infrastructure
Change how growth infrastructure is required or paid for. Require roads, pipes and water to be in place before fast-track housing is approved.Developers would have to show the infrastructure exists, is funded and can be delivered, new housing panels could decline projects, and the immigration policy would allow major population growth only where infrastructure exists or is funded.
First-home buyers
Not part of its policy
Renters
Not part of its policy
Tax on property
Not part of its policy

Opportunity

Ten national planning zones, Crown development finance, and a yearly land tax.Opportunity would replace what it says are over 1,000 planning zones with 10 national ones, pre-approve prefabricated systems, and change the Unit Titles Act to allow co-housing and papakāinga. Councils would get back GST on new builds meeting standards such as Homestar 6+ for infrastructure and community housing; councils, community housing providers, iwi and builders would get Crown development finance; Kāinga Ora would build to regional needs; and rental standards would rise. Its wider Tax Reset would tax urban land, homes included, at 1.75% a year to help fund a $19,400 Citizen's Income; the party projects property prices would fall 10 to 15%. The housing measures are not costed. The biggest tradeoff: the party says a land tax would lower prices, and that the Citizen's Income would leave most homeowning households better off; critics say owners, homeowners included, would bear a fall in land value and a yearly bill.

Public and community housing
Government builds more public homes. Direct Kāinga Ora to build the mix of homes each region needs; no number given.The policy says this is so smaller towns can clear their housing waitlists; it does not say how many homes Kāinga Ora would build.
Fund community and Māori housing providers. Crown development finance for councils, community housing providers, iwi and builders.The Community Housing lending facility would be expanded for affordable or social housing tailored to local needs, and GST refunds to councils would also fund community housing.
Planning, building and infrastructure
Make planning and building rules easier. Ten national planning zones and national pre-approval of proven prefabricated building systems.The zones would build on the Planning Bill with protections for productive farmland and heritage, councils could not ask for extra design reviews of certified systems, and Unit Titles Act changes would allow co-housing and papakāinga.
Change how growth infrastructure is required or paid for. Refund GST to councils on new builds meeting set standards, ring-fenced for infrastructure.The refund would apply to builds meeting standards such as Homestar 6+ or Passive House, and the party's infrastructure policy would also give councils grants and value capture tools.
First-home buyers
Not part of its policy
Renters
Strengthen renters' rights or rental standards. Raise Healthy Homes standards for rentals over time; extend insulation grants to rentals.Rental standards would rise over time, including a right to charge EVs, and Warmer Kiwi Homes retrofits would cover eligible private rentals.
Tax on property
Tax more. A yearly land value tax of 1.75% on urban land and 0.5% on rural land.Part of the wider Tax Reset that funds a Citizen's Income; it covers owner-occupied homes, with deferral for superannuitants and exemptions including social housing and communally owned Māori land.

Te Pāti Māori

More public and papakāinga homes, rent control, and taxes on property sales and empty homes.Te Pāti Māori would increase public housing investment, fund iwi and Māori housing providers, build 2,000 homes on papakāinga (whānau housing on Māori land) and make building on Māori land easier. For renters it lists "universal rent control" and "repealing no cause evictions". Its tax plan adds a 5% stamp duty on residential sales (first-home buyers of homes under $1 million exempt), a 2% vacant-house tax and a 33% land-banking tax, with revenue going to housing and other services. No cost or start date for the housing measures was found. The biggest tradeoff: the party says half of new social homes would go to whānau Māori, who it says make up half the waitlist, and that its property taxes would help fund housing; housing writer Rosie Gallen says the allocation does not itself add homes, and Deloitte, citing Inland Revenue, says stamp duties raise modest, volatile revenue and discourage moving.

Public and community housing
Government builds more public homes. More public housing investment, with half of new social homes for whānau Māori.Its January 2026 list includes "Radically increasing public housing investment" and allocating 50% of new social housing builds to whānau Māori; no number of public homes was found.
Fund community and Māori housing providers. 2,000 homes on papakāinga and direct funding for iwi and Māori housing providers.Its 2026 releases list building 2,000 houses on papakāinga and direct funding to iwi and Māori housing providers; Rosie Gallen reports the manifesto gives four years for the 2,000.
Planning, building and infrastructure
Make planning and building rules easier. Make it easier to build homes on Māori and ancestral land.Its housing page says it would make it easier to build homes on Māori and ancestral land; the sources read do not say which rules would change.
First-home buyers
Not part of its policy
Renters
Limit rent rises. Universal rent control; reported as a rent freeze, then limits on rises.Its January 2026 list includes "universal rent control"; Rosie Gallen reports the manifesto proposes "a rent freeze followed by limits on increases", with no level found in the sources read.
Strengthen renters' rights or rental standards. Repeal "no cause evictions".Its January 2026 list includes "repealing no cause evictions", which landlords can now use on periodic tenancies with 90 days' notice.
Tax on property
Tax more. 5% stamp duty on home sales, 2% vacant-house tax, 33% land-banking tax.From its tax plan, which exempts first-home buyers of homes under $1 million from the stamp duty; Rosie Gallen reports the manifesto would also repeal landlords' interest deductibility.
Background and sources

Prices and rents. Cotality's affordability report put the national value-to-income ratio at 6.7 in the second quarter of 2026, "matching its long-term average", down from a peak of 9.8 in late 2021, with median rents taking 25.5% of household income (Cotality). REINZ's national median selling price was $755,000 in September 2026, down 2.3% on a year earlier (interest.co.nz). Trade Me's median advertised rent was $625 a week in August 2026, up $5 on a year earlier (Trade Me). At the 2023 Census, 66.0% of households owned their home or held it in a family trust, up from 64.5% in 2018 (Stats NZ). In the year to August 2026, 41,268 new homes were consented, up 21.1% on the year before (interest.co.nz).

Social housing. The Infrastructure Commission counts "roughly 87,000 government-funded social housing places, around 73,000 owned by Kāinga Ora and 14,000 owned by CHPs" (community housing providers) (Te Waihanga). Official counts differ by source and definition (interest.co.nz). At 30 June 2026 there were 19,002 applicants on the Housing Register, people assessed as eligible who are not yet in public housing, and 5,094 on the Transfer Register, people already in public housing who need to move (MSD; MSD). 438 households were in emergency housing at the end of September 2026 (MSD), against 3,141 in December 2023, the baseline for the Government's target of 75% fewer (DPMC); the Audit Office found that from July to September 2025, 37.7% of applications for emergency housing were declined, and said more needs to be known about what happens to people turned down (The Audit Office).

What the Government has done since 2023. Housing Minister Chris Bishop's Going for Housing Growth programme requires the larger councils to zone for 30 years of housing demand (Beehive), and the Planning Bill and Natural Environment Bill, which replace the RMA, passed their third reading in September 2026, with the new system to be fully in place by 2030 (MCERT). Since early 2026, small standalone homes of up to 70 square metres built by authorised professionals need no building consent (1News). Development contributions are to be replaced by development levies, which councils could charge from 2029 (interest.co.nz), and Budget 2026 set aside $400 million over four years to pay councils for each new home consented (Budget 2026). Kāinga Ora's turnaround plan, from February 2025, has it build about 1,500 new homes a year from 2026/27 and sell about 900 older homes a year (Beehive), and new social homes are now funded mainly through a contestable Flexible Fund open to community housing providers, iwi and Māori providers (Beehive). The First Home Grant closed to new applications in 2024 (1News). Since 30 January 2025 landlords can end a periodic tenancy with no cause on 90 days' notice (Tenancy Services). In Budget 2026, Chris Bishop and Louise Upston announced that social housing tenants' minimum income-related rent would rise from 25% to 30% of income from 1 April 2027, about $31 a week more on average for about 84,000 households (Beehive). A 2024 tax law passed under Finance Minister Nicola Willis restored landlords' interest deductions, to 100% from 1 April 2025, and since 1 July 2024 the bright-line test taxes gains on residential property sold within two years (Beehive; Inland Revenue; Inland Revenue). Inland Revenue estimated that restoring interest deductibility would cost $2,920 million over the forecast period to 2027/28, and reported Treasury's view that "the bulk of the impact from restoring interest deductibility is likely to be reflected in house prices, with minimal impacts on rents" in the short and medium term (Inland Revenue). Since 2 July 2026, national standards permit papakāinga of up to 10 homes on Māori ancestral land in most rural, residential and Māori purpose zones (Ministry for the Environment). Each decision's minister is named in the entries; under this site's rule, a decision counts as a party's position only when its own ministers made it.

What research says about the main levers. None of these studies assesses a party's 2026 plan. Studies of Auckland's 2016 upzoning by Ryan Greenaway-McGrevy and colleagues found "strong evidence that upzoning stimulated construction" (Journal of Urban Economics) and, in a 2024 working paper, that rents would have been about 28% higher without it (University of Auckland); economists Cameron Murray and Tim Helm dispute the method and say "There is no evidence that upzoning increased housing construction" (Fresh Economic Thinking). In a 2022 survey of 44 New Zealand Association of Economists members, about 80% disagreed that rent controls such as New York City's had had a positive impact on the amount and quality of affordable rental housing, and about 7% agreed (NZAE). This is indirect evidence: the question was about rent control like New York City's, not a cap on annual rises. In 2019 the Tax Working Group's majority, by 8 to 3, recommended taxing capital gains on "all land and buildings, business assets, intangible property and shares", estimating it would "raise roughly $8 billion over the first five years", while three members preferred taxing only residential rental property (Tax Working Group); it expected "some small upward pressure on rents and downward pressure on house prices" (OneRoof). A 2009 Inland Revenue and Treasury paper cited an estimate that a 1% land tax would cut land values by 16.7% (Inland Revenue and Treasury).

Other pages. Labour's capital gains tax would pay for free GP visits, compared on the GP costs page. The Greens' wealth tax, Opportunity's Citizen's Income and Te Pāti Māori's tax plan are compared on the income tax page, and KiwiSaver first-home withdrawals on the KiwiSaver page. This page covers what those taxes do to property.

ACT

ACT would end loss ring-fencing, the rule that stops landlords using rental losses to cut tax on their other income. Losses from the day the change takes effect could be offset; ACT says this would ease pressure on rents. It puts the cost at $264 million in year one, rising to $303 million in year four, inside a fiscal plan with "no new taxes". ACT would also "Exclude purely spiritual and religious effects from consenting" and "Ban compulsory religious observances in consent conditions". The biggest tradeoff: ACT says ending ring-fencing would ease pressure on rents, but it reduces government revenue and ACT has not estimated extra homes or lower rents; the consent change would stop consents requiring karakia, which ACT says developers must pay for, and would remove spiritual effects as a ground for decisions.

  • ACT would rule out refusing, restricting or adding conditions to a consent on a claim of spiritual harm alone, and would stop consents requiring what it calls a religious observance, such as karakia.
  • This lowers tax for landlords whose rentals make a loss; ACT's fiscal plan has "no new taxes", and Seymour says a capital gains tax "will hit people hard".

Who gains

  • Party claimLandlords whose rentals make a loss could set it against other income from the day the change takes effect, for existing homes and new builds. ACT says the change "will ease pressure on rents, freeing up money for repairs and investment in more homes". [2][1]
  • Party claimACT says people seeking consents, including to build a house, could not be required to take part in or pay for what it calls a religious observance, such as karakia. [8][7]
  • Established evidenceThe Treasury and Inland Revenue said in 2018 that about 40 percent of taxpayers with rentals record rental losses. [5]

Who pays

  • Party claimACT says the ring-fencing change would reduce government revenue by $264 million in year one, rising to $303 million in year four, within a fiscal plan that has no new taxes. [1][4]
  • Party claimUnder ACT's proposal, effects ACT classes as purely spiritual or religious could no longer on their own justify refusing or conditioning a consent, and consents could not require what ACT calls religious observances, including karakia; anyone raising such effects, including iwi and hapū, could no longer rely on them alone. ACT says heritage sites, urupā and customary physical uses would still be considered. No response from iwi, hapū or Māori organisations was found as at 18 October 2026. [8][9]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Party claimACT says it estimated the cost by reversing the impact of the rules when they were introduced, consistent with Treasury's approach: $264 million in year one rising to $303 million in year four. [1]
  • Established evidenceACT's fiscal plan does not name the policy but has a revenue line marked "To be announced" with the same first- and fourth-year figures. [4]
  • Independent estimateWhen the rule was brought in, the Treasury and Inland Revenue expected it to raise about $190 million a year. [5]
  • Established evidenceNo independent costing of ACT's policy was found as at 18 October 2026. [1][3]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Independent estimateInland Revenue's 2018 issues paper said ring-fencing aimed at levelling the playing field, because investors setting rental losses against other income were "helping them to outbid owner-occupiers for properties". [6]
  • Independent estimateThe 2018 Treasury and Inland Revenue impact statement said that under ring-fencing "Landlords may also pass on their rental losses to tenants in the form of increased rents", and that less rental supply could push rents up. [5]
  • Party claimDavid Seymour says a capital gains tax "will not change house prices, it hasn't done that anywhere." [12]
  • Independent estimateIn 2019 the Tax Working Group's majority expected its broader capital gains tax to put "some small upward pressure on rents and downward pressure on house prices"; three members preferred taxing only residential rental property. [31][30]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceACT has not estimated how many extra homes the ring-fencing change would bring or how much it would lower rents, and has not given a cost or start date for the consent changes. [1][8]
  • Party claimACT says the change mostly brings forward deductions landlords would eventually claim and does not increase the total deduction; Seymour also said some losses may never be used under current rules and that earlier deductions reduce revenue in the meantime. [1]

Implementation

  • Party claimACT says losses already ring-fenced would stay under the existing rules, with the new treatment applying to losses incurred from the day the policy takes effect. [2]
  • Party claimACT says heritage sites, urupā, archaeological sites, customary physical uses and Treaty settlement rights would still be dealt with directly in consenting. [8]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimACT says "There's no such thing as a tax on landlords that renters can safely ignore"; Simon Court says no one should be "made to take part in, or pay for, a religious ceremony" for a consent. [2][7]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedInland Revenue's 2018 paper said offsetting rental losses helped investors "outbid owner-occupiers for properties", and ACT puts the revenue cost at $264–303 million a year; no named critic of either ACT measure was found. [6][1]
  1. ACT to abolish another of Labour's renters' taxes (14 October 2026) · ACT New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  2. Abolish Labour's Rental Tax · ACT New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  3. ACT leader David Seymour pledges to abolish loss ring-fencing for rental properties (14 October 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  4. ACT Fiscal Plan 2026 · ACT New Zealand (hosted by interest.co.nz) · accessed 15 Oct 2026 · archived copy (17 Oct 2026)
  5. Impact Statement: Ring-fencing rental losses (1 August 2018) · The Treasury and Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  6. Ring-fencing rental losses: an officials' issues paper (March 2018) · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  7. Leave spirituality out of infrastructure (3 October 2026) · ACT New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  8. Leave Spirituality out of Infrastructure · ACT New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  9. ACT pledges to ban compulsory karakia from resource consents if elected (3 October 2026) · Te Ao Māori News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  10. Housing and Infrastructure policies · ACT New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  11. A Fair Contribution for Infrastructure · ACT New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  12. Hipkins coming apart (14 July 2026) · ACT New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  13. NZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked (14 October 2026) · realestate.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  14. Where NZ political parties stand on housing ahead of the 2026 election (21 September 2026) · MyMortgage · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  15. ACT welcomes National backing off three by three housing law (2 April 2023) · ACT New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  16. Act promises to scrap building consent process (10 September 2023) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  17. ACT's Record (Housing and Infrastructure) · ACT New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  18. Rents falling as Government ditches anti-landlord ideology thanks to ACT (7 May 2026) · ACT New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  19. Delivering fairer social housing (21 May 2026) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  20. Flexi Fund opens for social & affordable housing (27 February 2026) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  21. Going for Housing Growth stage one unveiled (4 July 2024) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  22. Turnaround plan to get Kāinga Ora back on track (4 February 2025) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  23. Passage of major tax bill welcomed (27 March 2024) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  24. Government agrees to restore interest deductions (10 March 2024) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  25. Incentivising councils to go for housing growth (28 May 2026) · New Zealand Government (budget.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  26. Housing Minister Chris Bishop details proposed new levy system for infrastructure (16 September 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  27. Planning Bill and Natural Environment Bill pass Third Reading (23 September 2026) · Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  28. Granny flat consent exemption takes effect (15 January 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  29. Changes To Encourage More Rental Homes Passed Into Law (12 December 2024) · Scoop (New Zealand Government release) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  30. Tax Working Group recommends capital gains tax: what it means for property owners (21 February 2019) · OneRoof · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  31. Tax Working Group delivers Final Report (21 February 2019) · Tax Working Group · accessed 18 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 18 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1][8][4][5]

Green

The Greens would build "tens of thousands" of public homes, fund councils, community housing providers and papakāinga on Māori land, and require councils to enable enough new housing, including in existing urban areas. Rent rises would be capped at 2% a year, with a new tenancy's rent tied to the previous rent, no-cause terminations would end, and rentals would need an independently certified warrant of fitness. Landlords could no longer deduct mortgage interest, investment homes sold within 10 years would be taxed, and property would count toward a 2.5% tax on net wealth over $10 million. The biggest tradeoff: the party says renters would get capped rents and more public homes, while landlords with mortgages would pay more tax; ACT says rent caps would mean fewer rentals, and the party has published no cost for the public homes.

  • The policy document says "In the next 5 years, we could build 35,000 new public homes", using prefabrication and long-term building contracts.
  • Councils and community housing providers would get long-term funding and financing to scale up public housing, and Whai Kāinga Whai Oranga would fund more Māori housing.
  • Councils would have to enable enough new housing to meet demand, including in existing urban areas, and barriers to Māori building on their own land would be removed.
  • A Renters' Rights Bill would cap annual rent increases at no more than 2% and link a new tenancy's rent to what the previous tenants paid.
  • Tenants would get longer-term security without no-cause terminations, and rentals would need an independently certified warrant of fitness on top of stronger Healthy Homes Standards.
  • Landlords could not deduct mortgage interest, investment homes sold within 10 years would be taxed, and property would count toward a 2.5% tax on net wealth over $10 million.

Who gains

  • Party claimRenters: the Greens say rent rises would be capped at no more than 2% a year and rental homes would be "safe, warm, and healthy", and that public housing "is the best way to ensure that everyone has an affordable home". [2]
  • Party claimThe party says reversing the landlord tax changes "removes a key tax advantage for property investors and levels the playing field for renters and first-home buyers". [11]

Who pays

  • Party claimLandlords with mortgages: the party says removing interest deductibility "will have no impact on owner-occupiers – only leveraged property investors". Investors selling residential investment property within 10 years would pay income tax on the gain, up from two years now, and landlords' annual rent increases would be limited to no more than 2%. [11][14][1]
  • Established evidenceThe party has not said how the public homes would be funded or what they would cost. [2][4]
  • Party claimPeople with net wealth over $10 million ($20 million for a couple), counting property but not the family home, would pay the party's proposed 2.5% annual wealth tax. [11]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Party claimThe party puts the revenue from removing interest deductibility at $876 million in 2027/28, rising to $1,003 million in 2030/31, and from the 10-year bright-line test at $45 million a year. It says the 2024 deductibility change cost "$3 billion" (its housing document says "$2.9 billion"). [11][2]
  • Established evidenceThe Greens have published no cost for the public homes; Swarbrick said in March the housing policy "does not represent one of the fully costed policies" the party would release. [4][2]
  • ContestedThe Taxpayers' Union costed the public homes itself at $9.4 billion over four years, assuming forecast 2026/27 house-building spending and the 2023/24 peak build rate, and the Rental Warrant of Fitness at $21 million over four years. These are the Union's own assumptions, not an official costing, and its four-year window does not match the party's five-year 35,000-home figure. [20]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Independent estimateInland Revenue estimated that restoring landlords' interest deductions would cost $2,920 million over the forecast period to 2027/28, and Treasury said most of the effect would be on house prices, "with minimal impacts on rents" in the short and medium term. [12]
  • Established evidenceInland Revenue's 2024 impact statement said denying interest deductions is an exception to the general rule that income is taxed after costs, and that restoring them "would therefore increase coherence". [12]
  • Independent estimateIn the earlier debate on ring-fencing, Inland Revenue's 2018 issues paper said the rules aimed at levelling the playing field, because investors setting rental losses against other income were "helping them to outbid owner-occupiers for properties". It does not assess the party's plan. [26]
  • ContestedStudies of Auckland's 2016 upzoning by Ryan Greenaway-McGrevy and colleagues found it stimulated building and, in a 2024 working paper, that rents would have been about 28% higher without it; Cameron Murray and Tim Helm dispute the method. None of these studies assesses a party's plan. [22][24][23]
  • ContestedIn a 2022 survey of 44 New Zealand Association of Economists members, about 80% disagreed that rent controls such as New York City's had had a positive impact on the amount and quality of affordable rental housing, and about 7% agreed. This is indirect evidence: the question was about rent control like New York City's, not a cap on annual rises. [21]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceThe party's documents do not say how the 2% cap or the Rental Warrant of Fitness would work in detail, or give a timetable for the public homes. [2][1]

Implementation

  • Established evidenceLabour leader Chris Hipkins has ruled out changing interest deductibility, and has said Labour would not adopt the Greens' tax policies. [15][16]
  • Party claimThe rent cap and renter changes would be passed in a Renters' Rights Bill, and the party's tax costings begin in 2027/28. [2][11]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimChlöe Swarbrick says "Mass building of public housing almost 100 years ago led to decades of stable, affordable homes", and that renters' rights and tax changes would stop housing being "treated as a state-sanctioned casino". [5][4]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedACT housing spokesperson Cameron Luxton says "Rent caps don't create a single new home" and "make it harder to be a landlord", and of the public homes promise, "Repeating it won't change the outcome." [25]
  1. Manifesto 2026: Housing · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  2. A home for everybody: Green Party housing policy document (2026) · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  3. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis (26 March 2026) · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  4. Greens pledge 'to stop housing being treated as a state-sanctioned casino' (25 March 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  5. Greens promise to cap rent rises at 2 percent a year (RNZ, 25 March 2026) · Otago Daily Times · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  6. Housing and Sustainable Communities Policy (reviewed 2022, version 17 June 2026) · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  7. Green Budget 2025 · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  8. Keep Public Housing: open letter to Ministers on Kāinga Ora sales (2026) · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  9. Manifesto 2026: Local Government · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  10. Greens back bed levy, National wants more car parks and Labour focuses on Elevate NZ Venture Fund (14 October 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  11. A tax system for all: Green Party tax policy 2026 (full policy document) · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  12. Regulatory Impact Statement: Reintroducing interest deductibility on residential investment property (2024) · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  13. Changes to the interest limitation rules · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  14. The bright-line test · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  15. Labour rules out interest deductibility changes for landlords (21 September 2026) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  16. What are the Greens' tax plans - and who would have to pay? (4 October 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026 · archived copy (17 Oct 2026)
  17. Bill drawn to ensure young people aren't made homeless when leaving Oranga Tamariki (21 May 2026) · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  18. Homelessness at historic levels in New Zealand (18 June 2026) · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  19. Green Party launches plan to get more low-income Kiwis into their own home (undated) · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  20. 2026 Election Bribe-O-Meter: Green Party cost breakdown (week 6 update) · New Zealand Taxpayers' Union · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  21. Members & experts mostly agree on rent control, high-skilled migration, & MMT (20 August 2022) · New Zealand Association of Economists · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  22. The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Auckland (Greenaway-McGrevy and Phillips, Journal of Urban Economics 136, 2023) · Cowles Foundation, Yale University (reprint of Journal of Urban Economics article) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  23. The Auckland myth: There is no evidence that upzoning increased housing construction (4 June 2023) · Fresh Economic Thinking (Cameron Murray and Tim Helm) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  24. Can zoning reform reduce housing costs? Evidence from rents in Auckland (Greenaway-McGrevy and So, Economic Policy Centre Working Paper 016, March 2024) · University of Auckland Economic Policy Centre · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  25. Greens revive campaign to make more people homeless (25 March 2026) · ACT New Zealand · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  26. Ring-fencing rental losses: an officials' issues paper (March 2018) · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 18 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1][2][11]

Labour

Labour would give Kāinga Ora $2.9 billion over four years for state houses, and says Kāinga Ora and community housing providers would deliver at least 6,000 more social housing places. It would raise the Crown guarantee on community housing bonds to $950 million, which it says would cut providers' borrowing costs. It would keep social housing rents at 25% instead of the Government's planned rise to 30%. Labour says it opposed the return of no-cause terminations and "pledged to fix it", but has published no details. The biggest tradeoff: Labour says the state houses would be paid from future Budget allowances, but has not said how keeping rents at 25% would be funded; a 28% capital gains tax on investment and commercial property gains after 1 July 2027 would fund health; Labour says the tax would have little effect on rents, and National says it would reduce rental supply.

  • Labour says the $2.9 billion of capital goes to Kāinga Ora, with operating money for rent subsidies and running costs at Kāinga Ora and community providers, paid from future Budget allowances.
  • From its first Budget in 2027, which Labour says would cut providers' borrowing costs by about half a percentage point, alongside reliable funding so providers can plan ahead.
  • Labour would retain current income-related rent settings for Kāinga Ora and community housing tenants, and has ruled out increasing the Accommodation Supplement as a substitute.
  • Labour says the family home and farms would be exempt and the revenue would go to health; it would make no further change to landlords' interest deductions.

Who gains

  • Party claimPeople waiting for social housing, through what Labour says would be at least 6,000 more places over four years, and community housing providers such as charities, iwi, Pacific and disability organisations, through lower borrowing costs. Labour says the plan means "More secure homes for families and more work for builders, electricians, plumbers, engineers and apprentices." [1][3][8]
  • Party claimKāinga Ora and community housing tenants, whose income-related rent would stay at the current setting. The Government says its planned rise from 25% to 30% of income would affect about 84,000 households, by about $31 a week on average. [13][12]

Who pays

  • Party claimTaxpayers, through future Budget operating and capital allowances, which Labour says will fund the plan; its fiscal plan counts $2.9 billion of capital for Kāinga Ora housing over four years. [3][4]
  • Party claimSellers of residential investment and commercial property, at 28% on gains made after 1 July 2027; the family home, lifestyle blocks and farms are exempt, Labour says nine in 10 people would not pay, and the revenue goes to health. The sources read do not say how the tax would treat Māori land, iwi and Māori authority property or Treaty settlement assets. [14]
  • Party claimThe Crown would carry the risk on the $950 million community housing guarantee, which McAnulty says "would only be called on in the unlikely event of a default". [8][10]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Party claim$2.9 billion of capital for Kāinga Ora over four years, plus operating funding that Labour's page gives as $745 million and 1News and interest.co.nz report as $760 million, mostly falling between 2028 and 2031. [3][1][2]
  • Party claimLabour's fiscal plan counts $2.8 billion from the capital gains tax, reported as about $100 million in the first year rising to $1.35 billion in 2030. The figures assume house prices rise 3% a year, which Barbara Edmonds calls "conservative". [5][15][16]
  • Established evidenceNo independent costing of Labour's housing package, its community housing guarantee or its social rent pledge was found as at 18 October 2026. [1][10][13]
  • Party claimThe Government says its rent rise saves an estimated $387.5 million, which it is redirecting to higher Accommodation Supplement payments; keeping rents at 25% would forgo those savings. Labour has not said how it would fund this, and has ruled out raising the Accommodation Supplement as a substitute. [30][13]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Independent estimateInland Revenue estimated that restoring landlords' interest deductions would cost $2,920 million over the forecast period to 2027/28, and Treasury said most of the effect would be on house prices, "with minimal impacts on rents" in the short and medium term. [25]
  • Established evidenceInland Revenue's 2024 impact statement said denying interest deductions is an exception to the general rule that income is taxed after costs, and that restoring them "would therefore increase coherence". [25]
  • Party claimLabour says "Decades of international evidence shows there is little impact on rent from a CGT", and Hipkins says evidence received in government was that rents "are more likely to be influenced by interest rates" and by wage growth. [14][21]
  • ContestedSpeaking about Australia, Greg Jericho of the Australia Institute says "Taxing capital gains does not reduce housing supply or increase rents". In the same article National argues Labour's tax would reduce rental supply and raise rents. [15]
  • Independent estimateIn 2019 the Tax Working Group's majority expected its broader capital gains tax to put "some small upward pressure on rents and downward pressure on house prices"; three members preferred taxing only residential rental property. [27][26]
  • Party claimMcAnulty, citing a CHFA estimate, says the guarantee would cut borrowing costs "by around half a percentage point" and that "for every 11 homes built, the financing efficiency could pay for a twelfth". [8][10]
  • Party claimHousing Minister Chris Bishop responded that CHFA had "financed 34 community and affordable housing providers" and was "enabling refinancing at a fixed rate of 4% for three to five years". [10]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceLabour has not said how the 6,000 places would be split between Kāinga Ora and community providers, or how many would be new builds. Labour says it opposed the no-cause termination changes and "pledged to fix it", and that it will "make renting fairer and more secure", but no details were found as at 18 October 2026. No Labour policy for first-home buyers was found. [3][22][23]
  • Established evidenceMSD's June 2026 report puts Māori at about 47% of main applicants on the social housing register with a recorded ethnicity, so Labour's social housing measures bear on Māori tenants. Labour has not said how many places would go to iwi or Māori providers, and no Labour policy specific to Māori or papakāinga housing was found as at 18 October 2026. [29][3][13]
  • ContestedQuoted in an article on Labour's tax, Robin Oliver, a former Inland Revenue deputy commissioner, says "the revenue is highly variable and one limited to property prices more than most", and Norman Gemmell says it "could change quite a lot from year to year". [15]

Implementation

  • Party claimLabour says work would start within a year of taking office, with the community housing guarantee from its first Budget in 2027 and the capital gains tax valuation date on 1 July 2027. [3][8][14]
  • Established evidenceThe Government's income-related rent rise is phased in over 12 months at each tenant's annual review, from 1 April 2027, so keeping the current setting would mean stopping a change already scheduled. [12][13][28]
  • Party claimLabour MP Deborah Russell says a rating valuation could be used where an owner has no valuation for 1 July 2027. [17]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimLabour says "New Zealand needs more homes" and "Kāinga Ora will get building again". Kieran McAnulty says "One of the fastest and most effective ways to build more homes is to reduce the cost of finance". [3][11]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedWaatea News says the proposal's effectiveness "will depend on how much of the funding is directed towards new homes", and National's Simeon Brown says Labour "has no idea how to deliver" its promises. [7][1]
  1. Labour's $4.3b jobs plan: State homes, school and hospital repairs (24 September 2026) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  2. Labour promises to build more homes, fix school buildings and hospitals (24 September 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  3. Start Work Now · New Zealand Labour Party · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  4. Labour's Fiscal Plan · New Zealand Labour Party · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  5. Labour reveals vaunted fiscal plan - here's the key details (4 October 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  6. NZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked (14 October 2026) · realestate.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  7. Election 2026: Housing battle erupts as National, Labour and NZ First unveil plans (16 October 2026) · Waatea News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  8. Labour backs community housing to build more homes (24 June 2026) · New Zealand Labour Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  9. Hon Kieran McAnulty · New Zealand Labour Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  10. Labour puts forward plan to reduce costs for community housing providers, proposes Crown guarantee (24 June 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  11. Labour targets community housing finance costs (25 June 2026) · MPA (Mortgage Professional Australia) NZ · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  12. Budget 2026: Government announces social housing shakeup (21 May 2026) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  13. Labour pledges to protect social housing tenants from rent hikes (1 July 2026) · Waatea News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  14. Capital Gains Tax · New Zealand Labour Party · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  15. Is a capital gains tax ringfenced for health budget growth workable? (11 October 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  16. Barbara Edmonds on house prices, debt and how much Labour's fuel tax freeze proposal will cost (7 October 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  17. Election 2026: where do the parties stand on tax? (21 September 2026) · Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  18. Where NZ political parties stand on housing ahead of the 2026 election (21 September 2026) · MyMortgage · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  19. Labour rules out interest deductibility changes for landlords (21 September 2026) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  20. Labour rules out interest deductibility changes while PM celebrates India FTA (22 September 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  21. Property investors relieved at Labour's call to keep 'tax-cut for landlords' (RNZ, 22 September 2026) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  22. Affordable homes for all · New Zealand Labour Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  23. Property managers wary of Labour's rent plans (RNZ, 9 October 2026) · Otago Daily Times · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  24. Labour vows to build another 6000 state houses (RNZ, 24 September 2023) · Otago Daily Times · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  25. Regulatory Impact Statement: Reintroducing interest deductibility on residential investment property (2024) · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  26. Tax Working Group recommends capital gains tax: what it means for property owners (21 February 2019) · OneRoof · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  27. Tax Working Group delivers Final Report (21 February 2019) · Tax Working Group · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  28. Delivering fairer social housing (21 May 2026) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  29. Social Housing Register, 30 June 2026 (monthly housing report) · Ministry of Social Development · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  30. 'Hard choices': Social housing overhaul to hike rents for 84,000 households (21 May 2026) · Rova · accessed 18 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 18 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [3][8][13][14][19]

National

National's 2026 housing policy would raise the First Home Loan income cap, which lets buyers borrow with a 5% deposit through Kāinga Ora, to $300,000 for all applicants. It has promised no new taxes. From its record, its ministers passed RMA replacement laws, set council growth targets, allowed consent-free granny flats and plan development levies. Kāinga Ora's building was cut to about 1,500 new homes a year; ministers credit its turnaround plan and cost control with a $9.5 billion cut in forecast peak debt. A contestable fund replaced a ring-fenced Māori fund. Ministers restored landlords' interest deductions and no-cause terminations, and will raise social rents to 30% of income. The biggest tradeoff: more buyers on higher incomes could use 5% deposits, which National puts at $4–6 million and says helps people who can afford a mortgage but not a 20% deposit; critics say it adds demand without adding homes.

  • Budget 2024 funded 1,500 places through community housing providers, $200 million was brought forward for Māori housing, and Budget 2026 put $69.2 million into the contestable Flexible Fund, which replaced a ring-fenced Māori housing fund, for 1,800 to 2,250 more homes from 2028/29.
  • The Planning and Natural Environment bills passed in September 2026; National's 2026 plan would implement them and let engineers sign off some commercial building work.
  • Bishop and Simon Watts decided in February 2025 to replace development contributions with levies, in a bill due in early 2027; payments to councils start on 1 April 2027.
  • More buyers could borrow with a 5% deposit through the Kāinga Ora scheme; National puts the cost at $4–6 million, from existing budgets.
  • Bishop and Louise Upston announced the change in Budget 2026, about $31 a week more on average for about 84,000 households, alongside higher Accommodation Supplement maximums.
  • National has committed to no new taxes if re-elected; in government it restored interest deductibility and returned the bright-line test to two years.

Who gains

  • Party claimFirst-home buyers earning above the current caps and up to $300,000 could use the 5% deposit scheme; National says "around half of ordinary working households buying their first home exceed the current eligibility cap", and Bishop says "a junior doctor on $100,000 can't access the scheme". [2][12]
  • Established evidenceFrom its record in government, residential landlords can deduct all their mortgage interest from 1 April 2025, and sellers of homes held for more than two years are outside the bright-line test from 1 July 2024. [20][21]
  • Party claimFrom its record, Bishop and Tama Potaka say Kāinga Ora's forecast peak debt has fallen by $9.5 billion. [34]
  • Party claimNational says replacing the RMA "will roughly halve the number of consents needed", and Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said he expected "as many as 13,000 more granny flats" over the next decade from the consent exemption. [5][27]

Who pays

  • Party claimNational says the first-home policy would cost $4–6 million, funded from existing budgets, with the Crown underwriting the loans through Kāinga Ora. [2]
  • Established evidenceBorrowers pay a lenders mortgage insurance premium of 1.2% of the loan, up from 0.5% after the Government stopped contributing in 2025. [14]
  • Party claimFrom April 2027 social housing tenants' rent rises from 25% to 30% of income; the Government says this means about $31 a week more on average for about 84,000 households, and that the $387.5 million saved will go to higher Accommodation Supplement payments of up to $30 a week. [43][51][44]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Party claimNational's document says the scheme cost about $14.5 million to run in 2024/25 and puts the extra cost of the wider cap at $4–6 million. [2][11]
  • Established evidenceNo independent costing of National's housing plan was found. [22][46]
  • Party claimFrom its record, the Government's own Budget figures are $69.2 million for 1,800 to 2,250 social homes from 2028/29 and $400 million over four years for councils' growth payments. [36][32]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • ContestedA NZ Herald analysis reported by B2B News found that in the six months after Australia removed income caps from its separate 5% deposit scheme, prices of homes below its price cap rose faster than those above it; this is indirect evidence, as New Zealand's First Home Loan still applies the lender's income test. Cotality's Kelvin Davidson says National's policy is "probably just reflecting reality without transforming the housing market or putting up prices". [16]
  • ContestedStudies of Auckland's 2016 upzoning by Ryan Greenaway-McGrevy and colleagues found it stimulated building and, in a 2024 working paper, that rents would have been about 28% higher without it; Cameron Murray and Tim Helm dispute the method. None of these studies assesses a party's plan. [48][50][30]
  • ContestedBishop said Treasury agreed restoring interest deductibility would put "downward pressure" on rents; Labour's Ginny Andersen said "That's just not true". [23]
  • Independent estimateInland Revenue estimated that restoring landlords' interest deductions would cost $2,920 million over the forecast period to 2027/28, and Treasury said most of the effect would be on house prices, "with minimal impacts on rents" in the short and medium term. [49]
  • Established evidenceInland Revenue's 2024 impact statement said denying interest deductions is an exception to the general rule that income is taxed after costs, and that restoring them "would therefore increase coherence". [49]

Risks and side effects

  • ContestedPeter Dunne says first-home incentives will not work unless the supply side is addressed. [16]
  • ContestedTe Matapihi says the contestable Flexible Fund, which replaced ring-fenced Māori housing funding, delivers only about 700 to 750 homes, and Te Ao Māori News reports that it focuses on operating subsidies rather than the infrastructure grants Māori land often needs; Tama Potaka says "we continue to commit and support Māori housing aspirations". [38]
  • Established evidenceNational's document gives no estimate of how many more buyers would use the scheme; Bishop said "thousands more" would. [2][13]
  • Party claimNational says the package is "fully funded to commence by 1 July 2027"; no independent costing was found. [4]

Implementation

  • Party claimNational says the scheme is run by Kāinga Ora with participating lenders, and the lender still makes the final decision and applies its usual income test. [2][11]
  • Established evidenceFrom the record, the RMA's replacement rolls out in stages until 2030, and the development levy bill is due to be introduced in the first quarter of 2027. [25][24]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimChris Bishop says "plenty of young couples now earn more than that but still struggle to save for a 20 per cent deposit" and "Right now, a junior doctor on $100,000 can't access the scheme." [12]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedThe Taxpayers' Union's Austin Ellingham-Banks says "National has spent years correctly arguing that New Zealand's housing crisis is a supply problem" and "National should stick to the supply-side reforms that make housing cheaper, not subsidise demand." [15]
  1. Giving more Kiwis access to 5% first home deposits · New Zealand National Party · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  2. Building the Future: Backing First Home Buyers (policy document) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  3. National is backing first home buyers (6 September 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  4. National's plan to welcome more Kiwis home · New Zealand National Party · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  5. National's Economic Plan (policy document) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  6. National to make it easier to build the future · New Zealand National Party · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  7. Building the Future: Backing Auckland to succeed · New Zealand National Party · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  8. Policies · New Zealand National Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026 · archived copy (15 Oct 2026)
  9. No new taxes under National · New Zealand National Party · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  10. No new taxes under National (23 August 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  11. National promises more access to low equity mortgages for first home buyers (6 September 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  12. National pledges to widen access to 5% first home deposits (6 September 2026) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  13. National would lift the first home loan income cap to $300,000 for every buyer (6 September 2026) · News Wire · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  14. Luxon defends raising costs for low deposit first home buyers (7 September 2026) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  15. National's first-home policy pumps demand, not supply (6 September 2026) · New Zealand Taxpayers' Union · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  16. National's $300k First Home Loan cap could lift prices (13 September 2026) · B2B News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  17. Five Percent Deposit Dream: National Promises Major Expansion of First Home Loans (6 September 2026) · Waatea News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  18. Govt vows to deliver 'meaningful income tax reduction' in 2024 (20 December 2023) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  19. Govt passes bright-line test, interest deductibility rule changes (27 March 2024) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  20. Changes to the interest limitation rules · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  21. The bright-line test · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  22. NZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked (14 October 2026) · realestate.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  23. MPs at odds on whether landlord tax breaks will actually lower rents (21 March 2024) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  24. Going for Housing Growth programme (last updated 16 October 2026) · Ministry of Housing and Urban Development · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  25. Planning Bill and Natural Environment Bill pass Third Reading (23 September 2026) · Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  26. RMA replacement laws pass final vote in Parliament (23 September 2026) · Farmers Weekly · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  27. Granny flat consent exemption takes effect (15 January 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  28. Exemption allowing granny flats to be built consent-free passes into law (23 October 2025) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  29. Consent-free granny flat rules to be expanded (28 April 2026) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  30. The Auckland myth: There is no evidence that upzoning increased housing construction (4 June 2023) · Fresh Economic Thinking (Cameron Murray and Tim Helm) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  31. Going for Housing Growth: New and improved infrastructure funding and financing tools (28 February 2025) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  32. Incentivising councils to go for housing growth (28 May 2026) · New Zealand Government (budget.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  33. Govt reveals plan to turn Kāinga Ora around (4 February 2025) · Inside Government NZ · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  34. Kāinga Ora's Turnaround Plan is working (12 February 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  35. New social housing places to support families into homes (2024) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  36. More social homes, better targeted (28 May 2026) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  37. Housing investment will deliver 400 affordable homes for whānau Māori (4 February 2025) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  38. Tahua 2026: Māori housing fears grow ahead of Budget 2026 (23 May 2026) · Te Ao Māori News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  39. Potaka defends housing record as report warns Māori are going backwards (11 August 2026) · Waatea News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  40. Residential Tenancies Amendment Act 2024 · Tenancy Services (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  41. Changes To Encourage More Rental Homes Passed Into Law (12 December 2024) · Scoop (New Zealand Government release) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  42. What the new residential tenancies law means for renters (30 January 2025) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  43. Budget 2026: Government announces social housing shakeup (21 May 2026) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  44. 'Hard choices': Social housing overhaul to hike rents for 84,000 households (21 May 2026) · Rova · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  45. Bishop partially privatises social housing (22 May 2026) · Politik · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  46. Where NZ political parties stand on housing ahead of the 2026 election (21 September 2026) · MyMortgage · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  47. Election 2026: Housing battle erupts as National, Labour and NZ First unveil plans (16 October 2026) · Waatea News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  48. The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Auckland (Greenaway-McGrevy and Phillips, Journal of Urban Economics 136, 2023) · Cowles Foundation, Yale University (reprint of Journal of Urban Economics article) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  49. Regulatory Impact Statement: Reintroducing interest deductibility on residential investment property (2024) · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  50. Can zoning reform reduce housing costs? Evidence from rents in Auckland (Greenaway-McGrevy and So, Economic Policy Centre Working Paper 016, March 2024) · University of Auckland Economic Policy Centre · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  51. Delivering fairer social housing (21 May 2026) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  52. National Environmental Standards for Papakāinga 2026 · Ministry for the Environment · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  53. Papakāinga reforms welcomed as Māori housing leaders urge focus on implementation (7 June 2026) · Te Ao Māori News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 18 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [2][9][24][36][15]

NZ First

NZ First would change fast-track law so housing developments are approved only after the roads, pipes, water, wastewater and other services they need are approved. Developers would have to show the infrastructure exists, is funded and can be delivered; councils would advise on network capacity; new expert panels for housing could decline projects; listed projects that have not applied by the end of 2028 would lose priority access; and the Minister for Housing would make housing referral decisions. NZ First has not published a cost, a start date or who would pay for infrastructure that is missing. The biggest tradeoff: NZ First says making funded infrastructure a condition of approval would protect existing communities from unfunded growth costs; National's Chris Bishop says the requirement is already in law, and Waatea's Matthew Tukaki warns of possible barriers for Māori housing developments.

  • Developers would have to show the infrastructure exists, is funded and can be delivered, new housing panels could decline projects, and the immigration policy would allow major population growth only where infrastructure exists or is funded.

Who gains

  • Party claimNZ First says existing communities would gain, because New Zealanders would no longer be "picking up the tab or suffering through developments being approved without adequate infrastructure in place". [1]

Who pays

  • Party claimDevelopers would have to show the infrastructure their project needs exists, is funded and can be delivered, and listed projects that have not applied by the end of 2028 would lose their preferential access. [1]
  • Established evidenceNZ First has not said who would pay for infrastructure that is missing. [1]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Established evidenceNZ First has not published a cost for the changes, and no independent costing of its plan was found as at 18 October 2026. [1][2]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Independent estimateAuckland Council says its pipeline of unanticipated development is about 50,000 to 60,000 new dwellings, whose infrastructure and services would cost the council about $3 billion. [21]
  • Established evidenceIn August 2026 the Government announced that councils could update development contributions for fast-track projects after an application is made. [4][17]
  • Party claimChris Bishop said "growth paying for growth" was a core government philosophy. [18]
  • ContestedBishop says "The fast-track system was designed to facilitate developments that are out of sequence", while Auckland mayor Wayne Brown says driving greenfield housing into rural areas through fast-track "is not a smart way to plan a city". [18][21]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceNZ First has not said how the new housing panels would decide whether infrastructure "will be in place". [1]

Implementation

  • Party claimNZ First says the changes would make the Minister for Housing responsible for housing referral decisions and create dedicated expert panels for housing; the end of 2028 is the only date it gives. [1]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimNZ First says "More housing is needed but fast-track housing developments must work in with their communities first and foremost," and New Zealanders should not be "picking up the tab" for them. [1]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedNational's Chris Bishop says the infrastructure requirement is already in the law and that fast-track "was designed to facilitate developments that are out of sequence". [16][18]
  • ContestedWaatea's Matthew Tukaki warns of possible barriers for Māori housing developments. [22]
  1. NZFirst Policy Announcement: Changes to Fast-Track Residential Approvals (14 October 2026) · New Zealand First · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  2. Changes to Fast-Track Residential Approvals · New Zealand First · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  3. NZ First pledges infrastructure test for fast-track housing projects (14 October 2026) · NZ Adviser (MPA) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  4. Improving infrastructure tools to for Fast-track (New Zealand Government release, 14 August 2026) · LiveNews.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  5. NZ First Announces Immigration Reform Policies (11 September 2026) · New Zealand First · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  6. Immigration Reform Policies · New Zealand First · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  7. Who can get public housing · Work and Income · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  8. NZ First mulls potential policy providing Crown co-investment for first-home buyers (22 July 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  9. NZ First reconsiders Crown co-ownership idea for first-home buyers (22 July 2026) · NZ Adviser (MPA) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  10. Where NZ political parties stand on housing ahead of the 2026 election (21 September 2026) · MyMortgage · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  11. New Zealand First Policy · New Zealand First · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  12. NZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked (14 October 2026) · realestate.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  13. Backing a New Zealand Owned Bank · New Zealand First · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  14. Winston Peters: Old Parties' Fiscal Policy Devoid of Economic Strategy (23 August 2026) · New Zealand First · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  15. New Zealand First 2023 Policies · New Zealand First · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  16. NZ First wants to slow down fast-track for housing, National says it's already happened (October 2026) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  17. Fast-tracked housing developments can't be paused, despite mayors' wishes — Bishop (17 August 2026) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  18. New fast-track fights: growth paying for growth v local backlash (20 August 2026) · The Spinoff · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  19. NZ's top agents surprised as foreign buyer ban quietly reversed (15 December 2025) · OneRoof · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  20. Peters to allow foreign buying of homes (22 July 2025) · The Kākā by Bernard Hickey · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  21. Auckland Council commits to stronger stance on unanticipated developments (8 September 2026) · Auckland Council (OurAuckland) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  22. Election 2026: Housing battle erupts as National, Labour and NZ First unveil plans (16 October 2026) · Waatea News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  23. Delivering fairer social housing (21 May 2026) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  24. Flexi Fund opens for social & affordable housing (27 February 2026) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  25. Going for Housing Growth stage one unveiled (4 July 2024) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  26. Turnaround plan to get Kāinga Ora back on track (4 February 2025) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  27. Passage of major tax bill welcomed (27 March 2024) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  28. Government agrees to restore interest deductions (10 March 2024) · New Zealand Government (beehive.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  29. Incentivising councils to go for housing growth (28 May 2026) · New Zealand Government (budget.govt.nz) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  30. Housing Minister Chris Bishop details proposed new levy system for infrastructure (16 September 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  31. Planning Bill and Natural Environment Bill pass Third Reading (23 September 2026) · Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  32. Granny flat consent exemption takes effect (15 January 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  33. Changes To Encourage More Rental Homes Passed Into Law (12 December 2024) · Scoop (New Zealand Government release) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 18 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1][5][16][21]

Opportunity

Opportunity would replace what it says are over 1,000 planning zones with 10 national ones, pre-approve prefabricated systems, and change the Unit Titles Act to allow co-housing and papakāinga. Councils would get back GST on new builds meeting standards such as Homestar 6+ for infrastructure and community housing; councils, community housing providers, iwi and builders would get Crown development finance; Kāinga Ora would build to regional needs; and rental standards would rise. Its wider Tax Reset would tax urban land, homes included, at 1.75% a year to help fund a $19,400 Citizen's Income; the party projects property prices would fall 10 to 15%. The housing measures are not costed. The biggest tradeoff: the party says a land tax would lower prices, and that the Citizen's Income would leave most homeowning households better off; critics say owners, homeowners included, would bear a fall in land value and a yearly bill.

  • The policy says this is so smaller towns can clear their housing waitlists; it does not say how many homes Kāinga Ora would build.
  • The Community Housing lending facility would be expanded for affordable or social housing tailored to local needs, and GST refunds to councils would also fund community housing.
  • The zones would build on the Planning Bill with protections for productive farmland and heritage, councils could not ask for extra design reviews of certified systems, and Unit Titles Act changes would allow co-housing and papakāinga.
  • The refund would apply to builds meeting standards such as Homestar 6+ or Passive House, and the party's infrastructure policy would also give councils grants and value capture tools.
  • Rental standards would rise over time, including a right to charge EVs, and Warmer Kiwi Homes retrofits would cover eligible private rentals.
  • Part of the wider Tax Reset that funds a Citizen's Income; it covers owner-occupied homes, with deferral for superannuitants and exemptions including social housing and communally owned Māori land.

Who gains

  • Party claimOpportunity says "Renters and lower income workers will benefit the most from the Tax Reset", and that its housing policy would give councils, community housing providers, iwi and builders low-cost Crown finance for affordable or social housing. [5][2]
  • Independent estimateMichael Fletcher finds single adults earning over about $30,000 would typically gain enough from the Tax Reset to pay the land tax on land worth up to about $650,000. [11]

Who pays

  • Established evidenceLandowners, including owner-occupiers, would pay a land value tax of 1.75% a year on urban land and 0.5% on rural land. Social housing, communally owned Māori land, Treaty settlement land (subject to consultation with iwi), conservation land and government land are exempt, and superannuitants could defer the tax until the property is sold. The sources read do not say how other Māori-owned land, such as land held by iwi or Māori trusts and incorporations, would be treated. [5][4]
  • Independent estimateEd McKnight of the property investment adviser Opes Partners calculates the tax on land worth $450,000 at $7,875 a year. [12]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Party claimOn 2024 numbers, land value tax revenue of $24,323 million a year, which the party says pays for the Citizen's Income with around $4 billion left over. [5][4]
  • Established evidenceOpportunity has not costed the GST refunds or the Crown finance, and no independent costing of its housing measures or land tax revenue was found as at 18 October 2026. [2][5]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Party claimOpportunity projects that a 1.75% land value tax "would cause a 10-15% reduction in property prices"; the paper does not show how this was calculated. [5]
  • Independent estimateA 2009 Inland Revenue and Treasury background paper, not about Opportunity's plan, cited an estimate that a 1% land tax would cut land values by 16.7%, and Inland Revenue modelling of 26.4% under other assumptions. [9]
  • ContestedThe 2009 Inland Revenue and Treasury paper says "land taxes cannot be passed on and would be borne by land owners at the time the tax is announced". Deloitte says that alongside a basic income a land tax "may result in upward pressure on rents". [9][10]
  • Established evidence1News notes that "Denmark has levied a land value tax for a century". [14]
  • ContestedStudies of Auckland's 2016 upzoning by Ryan Greenaway-McGrevy and colleagues found it stimulated building and, in a 2024 working paper, that rents would have been about 28% higher without it; Cameron Murray and Tim Helm dispute the method. None of these studies assesses a party's plan. [15][17][16]

Risks and side effects

  • ContestedDeloitte, citing Inland Revenue, says a land tax could "materially affect highly leveraged borrowers", and Michael Fletcher says some homeowners "could suddenly face the risk of negative equity". [11][10]
  • ContestedEd McKnight of the property investment adviser Opes Partners says the Citizen's Income paired with the land tax "would incentivise Kiwis to rent rather than own"; the party says most homeowning households would be better off. [12]
  • Established evidenceThe housing policy gives no cost, number of homes or start date. [2]

Implementation

  • Party claimThe transition plan has no land tax for the first two years, then 0.5% on urban land in year three, rising to 1.75% from year six, within a ten-year transition. [6][7]
  • Established evidenceThe land value tax and the Citizen's Income are not among Opportunity's five coalition bottom lines; 1News reports the party's full policy suite remains on the table for negotiation. [8]
  • Established evidenceThe planning, building and finance measures would need changes to planning law, the Unit Titles Act and the Building Code. The party has not given dates for them. [2]

Strongest case for

  • ContestedOpportunity says the land tax would lower land prices and reward building, and that with the Citizen's Income "most homeowning households will be better off". Michael Fletcher says land taxes are "economically efficient and relatively hard to avoid". [5][11]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedVictoria University's Michael Fletcher says an average home's bill, likely over $10,000 a year, would be "near impossible for many superannuitants, beneficiaries and others", and that some homeowners "could suddenly face the risk of negative equity". [11]
  1. Affordable Housing · The Opportunity Party · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  2. Affordable Housing (policy paper, September 2026) · The Opportunity Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  3. Inter-Generational Infrastructure · The Opportunity Party · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  4. Tax Reset · The Opportunity Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026 · archived copy (16 Oct 2026)
  5. Tax Reset (policy paper) · The Opportunity Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  6. Tax Reset transition plan (policy addendum, May 2026) · The Opportunity Party · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  7. Leader Qiulae Wong explains Opportunity Party's land tax and retirement savings policies (17 September 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  8. No land tax or 'citizens' income' in Opportunity's bottom lines (29 September 2026) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  9. Land tax: background paper for Session 3 of the Victoria University of Wellington Tax Working Group (September 2009) · Inland Revenue and the Treasury · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  10. Election tax policies: part one (Tax Alert, 13 July 2026) · Deloitte New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  11. Opportunity's tax reset could benefit many, but not the poorest (Michael Fletcher, Victoria University of Wellington, via The Conversation; 21 September 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026 · archived copy (17 Oct 2026)
  12. NZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked (14 October 2026) · realestate.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  13. Brian Fallow takes a close look at the Opportunity Party's tax reset plan (28 August 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  14. What are the Opportunity party's land tax and 'citizen's income'? (15 August 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  15. The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Auckland (Greenaway-McGrevy and Phillips, Journal of Urban Economics 136, 2023) · Cowles Foundation, Yale University (reprint of Journal of Urban Economics article) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  16. The Auckland myth: There is no evidence that upzoning increased housing construction (4 June 2023) · Fresh Economic Thinking (Cameron Murray and Tim Helm) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  17. Can zoning reform reduce housing costs? Evidence from rents in Auckland (Greenaway-McGrevy and So, Economic Policy Centre Working Paper 016, March 2024) · University of Auckland Economic Policy Centre · accessed 18 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 18 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [2][5][6][11]

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori would increase public housing investment, fund iwi and Māori housing providers, build 2,000 homes on papakāinga (whānau housing on Māori land) and make building on Māori land easier. For renters it lists "universal rent control" and "repealing no cause evictions". Its tax plan adds a 5% stamp duty on residential sales (first-home buyers of homes under $1 million exempt), a 2% vacant-house tax and a 33% land-banking tax, with revenue going to housing and other services. No cost or start date for the housing measures was found. The biggest tradeoff: the party says half of new social homes would go to whānau Māori, who it says make up half the waitlist, and that its property taxes would help fund housing; housing writer Rosie Gallen says the allocation does not itself add homes, and Deloitte, citing Inland Revenue, says stamp duties raise modest, volatile revenue and discourage moving.

  • Its January 2026 list includes "Radically increasing public housing investment" and allocating 50% of new social housing builds to whānau Māori; no number of public homes was found.
  • Its 2026 releases list building 2,000 houses on papakāinga and direct funding to iwi and Māori housing providers; Rosie Gallen reports the manifesto gives four years for the 2,000.
  • Its housing page says it would make it easier to build homes on Māori and ancestral land; the sources read do not say which rules would change.
  • Its January 2026 list includes "universal rent control"; Rosie Gallen reports the manifesto proposes "a rent freeze followed by limits on increases", with no level found in the sources read.
  • Its January 2026 list includes "repealing no cause evictions", which landlords can now use on periodic tenancies with 90 days' notice.
  • From its tax plan, which exempts first-home buyers of homes under $1 million from the stamp duty; Rosie Gallen reports the manifesto would also repeal landlords' interest deductibility.

Who gains

  • Party claimThe party says whānau Māori, who it says "make up 50% of the social housing waitlist", would get 50% of new social housing builds, and renters would get "universal rent control" and an end to no-cause terminations. [3]
  • Party claimIwi and Māori housing providers would get direct funding, and whānau on Māori land would get 2,000 homes on papakāinga, the party says. [3][4]

Who pays

  • Party claimThe tax plan puts a 5% stamp duty on residential sales, except first-home buyers of homes under $1 million, a 2% vacant-house tax and a 33% land-banking tax on property owners, and a wealth tax on people with net assets over $2 million. [9]
  • Established evidenceThe tax document does not say whether the buyer or the seller pays the stamp duty, or what the 2% and 33% rates are charged on. The sources read do not say whether Māori land, land held by iwi, hapū or Māori trusts, or Treaty settlement assets would be exempt from these taxes. [9]
  • Established evidenceOther applicants on the social housing register, who are about half of main applicants with a recorded ethnicity, would compete for the other half of new social homes; the party has not said how the allocation would be applied. [3][19]

Cost and costing disputes

  • ContestedNZ Tax Tools reports revenue figures of $2.1 billion for the stamp duty, $1.7 billion for the vacant-house tax and $2.8 billion for the land-banking tax, which could not be traced to the party's own documents. [11][9]
  • Established evidenceNo cost was found for the public housing investment, the 2,000 papakāinga homes or the provider funding, and no independent costing of the housing plan was found. [1][3][7]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • ContestedIn a 2022 survey of 44 New Zealand Association of Economists members, about 80% disagreed that rent controls such as New York City's had had a positive impact on the amount and quality of affordable rental housing, and about 7% agreed. This is indirect evidence: the question was about rent control like New York City's, not a cap on annual rises. [20]
  • ContestedCommenting on the party's plan, Deloitte notes Inland Revenue's 2026 Long Term Insights Briefing finds stamp duties raise "only modest and volatile revenue" and discourage people from moving. [14]
  • Established evidenceNo independent evidence on the vacant-house or land-banking taxes was found in the sources read. [9]
  • Independent estimateOn the party's figure that whānau Māori are half the waitlist, MSD's June 2026 report puts Māori at about 47% of main applicants on the social housing register with a recorded ethnicity. [19]
  • Independent estimateInland Revenue estimated that restoring landlords' interest deductions would cost $2,920 million over the forecast period to 2027/28, and Treasury said most of the effect would be on house prices, "with minimal impacts on rents" in the short and medium term. [13]
  • Established evidenceInland Revenue's 2024 impact statement said denying interest deductions is an exception to the general rule that income is taxed after costs, and that restoring them "would therefore increase coherence". [13]
  • Independent estimateIn the earlier debate on ring-fencing, Inland Revenue's 2018 issues paper said the rules aimed at levelling the playing field, because investors setting rental losses against other income were "helping them to outbid owner-occupiers for properties". It does not assess the party's plan. [22]
  • ContestedTe Matapihi's Ali Hamlin Paenga says papakāinga "are what makes the biggest impact on housing for Māori", and points to "the lack of infrastructure on Māori land". [18]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceThe sources read give no number of extra public homes, no rent-control level and no start dates, and the manifesto's housing section could not be opened to check them. [1][2][3]
  • ContestedKris MacDonald of Te Pouahi o Te Taitokerau Trust says, of the Government's papakāinga standards, "planning reform alone does not build homes", and that rules vary widely across councils. [17]

Implementation

  • Established evidenceBackground, not Te Pāti Māori policy: since 2 July 2026 the Government's national standards permit papakāinga of up to 10 homes on Māori ancestral land in most rural, residential and Māori purpose zones. [16]
  • Party claimRosie Gallen reports the manifesto sets four years for the 2,000 homes. Kaipara's Youth Homelessness Prevention Bill, a member's bill, would have an existing agency appointed as Rangatahi Ora with a legal duty to help young people who are homeless. [7][15]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimOriini Kaipara says "The greatest breach of Te Tiriti is when tangata whenua have no whenua and no home." The party's housing page says "Our people deserve homes, not waiting lists, overcrowding, or speculation." [3][1]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedHousing writer Rosie Gallen says "Allocating half of new social housing to Māori does not itself add stock", and that 2,000 homes on ancestral land "will require infrastructure, finance, workforce capacity" and changes to existing barriers. [7]
  1. Housing · Te Pāti Māori · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  2. Te Pāti Māori Policy Manifesto 2026: Housing (Housing.pdf, linked from its housing page) · Te Pāti Māori · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  3. Oriini Kaipara: Prime Minister's 'progress' ignores housing crisis facing Māori and rangatahi (29 January 2026) · Te Pāti Māori · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  4. Te Pāti Māori rejects move-on orders: "We will not police our way out of homelessness." (23 February 2026) · Te Pāti Māori · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  5. Tāmaki Makaurau: Meet two candidates vying for the smallest Māori seat (9 October 2026) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  6. Oriini Kaipara brings Toitū te Aroha into Parliament (28 January 2026) · Waatea News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  7. Seven parties, seven housing plans: What counts as success? (12 October 2026) · Rosie Gallen (Substack) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  8. Changes to tenancy terminations now in force (30 January 2025) · Tenancy Services (MBIE) · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  9. Te Pāti Māori Policy Manifesto 2026: Tax (released as A Kiwi Tax Plan, 26 August 2026) · Te Pāti Māori · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  10. Te Pāti Māori unveils 'Kiwi tax plan' with new 5% 'stamp duty' (RNZ, 26 August 2026) · Otago Daily Times · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  11. NZ Election 2026: Every Party's Tax Policy Compared (verified 13 October 2026) · NZ Tax Tools · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  12. Tax · Te Pāti Māori · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  13. Regulatory Impact Statement: Reintroducing interest deductibility on residential investment property (2024) · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  14. Election tax policies: part three (Tax Alert, 22 September 2026) · Deloitte New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026 · archived copy (17 Oct 2026)
  15. Youth Homelessness Prevention Bill, member's bill in the name of Oriini Kaipara (draft for consultation, 17 December 2025) · New Zealand Parliament · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  16. National Environmental Standards for Papakāinga 2026 · Ministry for the Environment · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  17. Papakāinga reforms welcomed as Māori housing leaders urge focus on implementation (7 June 2026) · Te Ao Māori News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  18. Tahua 2026: Māori housing fears grow ahead of Budget 2026 (23 May 2026) · Te Ao Māori News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  19. Social Housing Register, 30 June 2026 (monthly housing report) · Ministry of Social Development · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  20. Members & experts mostly agree on rent control, high-skilled migration, & MMT (20 August 2022) · New Zealand Association of Economists · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  21. The city with 2000 ghost homes: A 'hard problem to solve' (Local Democracy Reporting, 17 October 2024) · 1News · accessed 18 Oct 2026
  22. Ring-fencing rental losses: an officials' issues paper (March 2018) · Inland Revenue · accessed 18 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 18 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1][3][9][7]