All issues
Climate, energy and environment / Home energy and solar

How should households get solar?

Few homes have solar. Parties differ on loans, subsidies and rule changes to help.About 3% of New Zealand households have solar panels. EECA puts a small to medium rooftop system at $8,500 to $11,500, with a battery adding $5,000 to $15,000, and average savings of about $1,000 a year. Officials advising the government found the main barrier was the upfront cost. In August 2026 the government agreed to legalise plug-in solar panels and cut approval steps after a Ministry for Regulation review. For the election, the Greens, Labour, National, Opportunity and Te Pāti Māori back loans tied to the home and repaid over time, based on a council loan model called the Ratepayer Assistance Scheme; all but National add subsidies or publicly funded installs, and Te Pāti Māori a $1 billion fund for community and Māori-owned energy. ACT opposes subsidies and would let households sell exported power to other buyers and export more where the network has room; NZ First focuses on what households are paid for exported power. No party's solar plan has had an independent costing.

Uneven evidence. Some parties' plans have more published costings or analysis than others. Read what was found

As at 15 October 2026, no independent costing of any party's household solar plan was found. The Greens commissioned Infometrics to review the assumptions behind their whole energy package, and Labour cites loan savings modelling by SEANZ and Rewiring Aotearoa; neither is an independent costing of the policy. No outside analysis was found for National's, Opportunity's, ACT's, NZ First's or Te Pāti Māori's proposals; Te Pāti Māori's full energy policy, read on 17 October 2026, gives no costing beyond its $1 billion fund. Evidence sections therefore rely mostly on official advice about solar in general. This reflects what has been published, not a judgement on the plans.

ViewDepth
Party order is random for each visitor. Tap a party's answer (or its name in a table) for its full breakdown and sources.Order

Bottom lines on this question

What a party has publicly said it must get, or won't accept, to form or support a government after the election. Only the party's own statements count, quoted with their source. Parties marked Bottom line below have one on that answer.

  • No bottom line on this question found: ACT, Green, Labour, National, NZ First, Opportunity, Te Pāti Māori (checked 17 Oct 2026)

Every party's bottom lines, on all issues

These parties propose similar policies, so they are compared on the same rows.

Household solar loan and subsidy schemes

4 of 7 parties

Labour and Opportunity both use the name Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, a council loan model designed by Local Government New Zealand, the Local Government Funding Agency and Rewiring Aotearoa. National's policy document calls its Home Energy Fund a narrower version of the same scheme (10-year loans, 20% equity), and the Greens' loans use the same 20/80 ownership split but with the government paying the interest. The schemes share a model, not their terms.

QuestionZero-interest clean energy loans (Power for All of Us)SolarSaverHome Energy Fund (Electrify NZ)Abundant Energy (Ratepayer Assistance Scheme and Warmer Kiwi Homes expansion)
How it worksZero-interest loans over 15 to 30 years, tied to the property and repaid through a separate levy; some owners can defer repayment until sale. The government pays the interest.Government-backed loans through lines companies (at no more than the regulated cost of capital, put at about 6.5%; repaid on the power bill) or a council rates scheme Megan Woods says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates (no rate published); repayments set below expected bill savings10-year loans from a government and council platform that pays the installer upfront, at about 2% below floating rates (party spokesperson); repaid through rates or on saleLoans the party calls low-interest (rate not published) through a national council-run Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, tied to the property; councils borrow through the Local Government Funding Agency
Who qualifiesHomeowners with rateable property; the party says up to 90% of homeowners. Renters get a right to plug-in solarHomeowners; renters through plug-in panels; subsidy of up to $3,000 for low- and middle-income homeowners and renters (income limits not published)Ratepayers with at least 20% equity, in councils that choose to joinRateable properties (eligibility not specified); low-income households through Warmer Kiwi Homes
What it coversRooftop solar, batteries, energy efficiency and electrification upgradesSolar and batteries; the council scheme also covers heat pumps and other electrificationSolar, batteries, insulation, heat pumps and other electrificationElectrification loans; solar and electric appliances for low-income homes through Warmer Kiwi Homes
ExtrasSolar on more than half of public homes within four years; $200m community energy; $80m Māori housing renewables; plug-in solar; fair export prices$30m community battery fund; free EECA advice service; plug-in solar; fair time-of-use export rates; $4m workforce coordinationRooftop solar without a resource consent; small farm solar, batteries and micro-hydro permitted; plug-in panels on sale within six monthsGovernment co-investment in community-owned generation and storage up to 15 MW
Cost and fundingAbout $429m over four years for the loans (party estimate); wider package funded by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes$160m over four years (party estimate), from the Gas Security Fund$7m one-off Crown equity for a 20% share; councils and the Local Government Funding Agency fund the restAbout $6m a year to run the loans and about $200m a year for Warmer Kiwi Homes (party estimates), from power company dividends
StartLoans running within six months of entering government (party claim)Subsidies, loans and advice service within 12 months of taking officeNot stated; needs a Local Government Act amendmentNot stated; Warmer Kiwi Homes expansion funded from 2028/29

How it works

  • Zero-interest loans over 15 to 30 years, tied to the property and repaid through a separate levy; some owners can defer repayment until sale. The government pays the interest.
  • Government-backed loans through lines companies (at no more than the regulated cost of capital, put at about 6.5%; repaid on the power bill) or a council rates scheme Megan Woods says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates (no rate published); repayments set below expected bill savings
  • 10-year loans from a government and council platform that pays the installer upfront, at about 2% below floating rates (party spokesperson); repaid through rates or on sale
  • Loans the party calls low-interest (rate not published) through a national council-run Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, tied to the property; councils borrow through the Local Government Funding Agency

Who qualifies

  • Homeowners with rateable property; the party says up to 90% of homeowners. Renters get a right to plug-in solar
  • Homeowners; renters through plug-in panels; subsidy of up to $3,000 for low- and middle-income homeowners and renters (income limits not published)
  • Ratepayers with at least 20% equity, in councils that choose to join
  • Rateable properties (eligibility not specified); low-income households through Warmer Kiwi Homes

What it covers

  • Rooftop solar, batteries, energy efficiency and electrification upgrades
  • Solar and batteries; the council scheme also covers heat pumps and other electrification
  • Solar, batteries, insulation, heat pumps and other electrification
  • Electrification loans; solar and electric appliances for low-income homes through Warmer Kiwi Homes

Extras

  • Solar on more than half of public homes within four years; $200m community energy; $80m Māori housing renewables; plug-in solar; fair export prices
  • $30m community battery fund; free EECA advice service; plug-in solar; fair time-of-use export rates; $4m workforce coordination
  • Rooftop solar without a resource consent; small farm solar, batteries and micro-hydro permitted; plug-in panels on sale within six months
  • Government co-investment in community-owned generation and storage up to 15 MW

Cost and funding

  • About $429m over four years for the loans (party estimate); wider package funded by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes
  • $160m over four years (party estimate), from the Gas Security Fund
  • $7m one-off Crown equity for a 20% share; councils and the Local Government Funding Agency fund the rest
  • About $6m a year to run the loans and about $200m a year for Warmer Kiwi Homes (party estimates), from power company dividends

Start

  • Loans running within six months of entering government (party claim)
  • Subsidies, loans and advice service within 12 months of taking office
  • Not stated; needs a Local Government Act amendment
  • Not stated; Warmer Kiwi Homes expansion funded from 2028/29

Other parties

Not in the table above3 parties

  • ACT

    No subsidies; households could sell power to other buyers and export more where networks allow.ACT opposes solar subsidies; energy spokesperson Simon Court says "if solar stacks up, Kiwis are going to invest without handouts". Its election policy would let households sell the power they generate to a different company from the one they buy from, or to local businesses and community schemes, with metering, network charges and consumer protections. It would allow households to export more power where the network has room, make lines companies explain and justify restrictions, and require them to test major upgrades against options such as batteries. ACT has not published a cost or start date. The biggest tradeoff: ACT proposes no public spending on household solar, so households would still pay the upfront cost themselves; it has not said who would bear network costs from more exports.

  • NZ First

    Pay home solar owners the same price for exported power as they pay.NZ First's main electricity policy would split the large power companies into separate generators and retailers. Within it, the party says "if you generate power at home like solar, you should be able to sell it back to the grid at the same price you pay for it". It has not said how that price would be set. NZ First has not proposed loans or subsidies for household solar. Associate Energy Minister Shane Jones gives the party's reason: "we're not keen on individual houses, because we fear middle class capture"; he prefers solar on marae, council buildings and large commercial roofs. No cost or start date has been published. The biggest tradeoff: solar owners would be paid more for exports, but with no design published it is unclear who would pay the difference.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    $1 billion fund for Māori and community energy; solar finance and payment for exported power.Te Pāti Māori's 2026 policy manifesto would set up a $1 billion Energy Sovereignty Fund offering grants, concessional finance, guarantees, equity and co-investment, investing in reducing household energy costs, marae and papakāinga resilience, Māori-owned renewable generation, and community batteries and microgrids. It would support access to solar and batteries through "long-term, low-cost and zero-interest finance" and the Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, a council loan model, and would set a "fair-value framework" so households are "properly paid" for power they send back to the grid. Its climate section adds a $1 billion Pūngao Auaha Fund to put solar and insulation on marae, kura, papakāinga and housing. It has not published who would provide the finance, how export payments would be set, a funding source or a start date. The biggest tradeoff: communities would take ownership stakes in energy, but how much of the money would reach individual households is not known.

Parties are grouped by the approach they take. A party can take more than one.

Approaches

7 of 7 parties take at least one

Government-backed loans repaid over time5 parties

  • Green

    Homeowner loans with government-paid interest, solar on public homes, and plug-in solar rights for renters.The Greens would set up a loan scheme, owned 20% by central government and 80% by councils and the Local Government Funding Agency, offering homeowners loans over 15 to 30 years for solar, batteries and other electrification. The government would pay the interest. Loans would be tied to the property and repaid through a levy; some owners could defer repayment until they sell. Renters would get a right to plug-in solar, and solar would go on more than half of public homes within four years. The party costs the loans at about $429 million over four years and says its wider energy package would be paid for by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes. The biggest tradeoff: borrowers pay no interest, but the government pays it over loans of 15 to 30 years, beyond the four years costed.

  • Labour

    Government-backed solar loans, a subsidy of up to $3,000, and plug-in panels for renters.Labour's SolarSaver would offer two government-backed loans: one through lines companies at no more than the regulated cost of capital (about 6.5%, Megan Woods says), repaid on the power bill, and one through a council scheme repaid through rates, which Labour says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates; no rate has been published. Labour says repayments would be set below expected bill savings. Low- and middle-income homeowners and renters could get a subsidy of up to $3,000. Renters could use plug-in panels after a rule change. There would also be a $30 million community battery fund and free EECA advice. Labour costs the package at $160 million over four years, from the government's Gas Security Fund. The biggest tradeoff: the subsidy lowers upfront costs for some households, but it uses money set aside for gas field investment, and who qualifies is unpublished.

  • National

    10-year government and council loans repaid through rates, and rooftop solar without a consent.National's Home Energy Fund would be a lending platform owned by central government and the councils that choose to join. It would pay an approved installer upfront, and the homeowner would repay the loan over ten years through their rates, or when they sell; a National spokesperson put the rate at about 2% below floating. Loans would cover solar, batteries and other electrification, for ratepayers with at least 20% equity in their home. The Crown would put in $7 million for a 20% share; councils and the Local Government Funding Agency would provide the rest. Its planning reforms would also let owners install rooftop solar without a consent. No start date has been given. The biggest tradeoff: ratepayers with enough equity could spread the cost over ten years, but renters, owners with less equity and those in councils that do not join would miss out.

  • Opportunity

    Council-run loans for home electrification, and solar for low-income homes.Opportunity would set up a national Ratepayer Assistance Scheme run by local government, offering loans the party describes as low-interest for home electrification, tied to each rateable property. The party says the debt, borrowed through the Local Government Funding Agency, would sit off council and government books. It would also double the Warmer Kiwi Homes programme to about $200 million a year and extend it to solar and electric appliances for low-income households, and co-invest in community-owned generation and storage of up to 15 MW. The party puts the cost of running the loans at about $6 million a year, paid, with the rest of its energy plan, from Crown power company dividends of about $500 million a year. Loan rates, terms and a start date are not published. The biggest tradeoff: the plan uses existing dividends, but that money would no longer be available for other government spending.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    $1 billion fund for Māori and community energy; solar finance and payment for exported power.Te Pāti Māori's 2026 policy manifesto would set up a $1 billion Energy Sovereignty Fund offering grants, concessional finance, guarantees, equity and co-investment, investing in reducing household energy costs, marae and papakāinga resilience, Māori-owned renewable generation, and community batteries and microgrids. It would support access to solar and batteries through "long-term, low-cost and zero-interest finance" and the Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, a council loan model, and would set a "fair-value framework" so households are "properly paid" for power they send back to the grid. Its climate section adds a $1 billion Pūngao Auaha Fund to put solar and insulation on marae, kura, papakāinga and housing. It has not published who would provide the finance, how export payments would be set, a funding source or a start date. The biggest tradeoff: communities would take ownership stakes in energy, but how much of the money would reach individual households is not known.

Pay part of the cost4 parties

  • Green

    Homeowner loans with government-paid interest, solar on public homes, and plug-in solar rights for renters.The Greens would set up a loan scheme, owned 20% by central government and 80% by councils and the Local Government Funding Agency, offering homeowners loans over 15 to 30 years for solar, batteries and other electrification. The government would pay the interest. Loans would be tied to the property and repaid through a levy; some owners could defer repayment until they sell. Renters would get a right to plug-in solar, and solar would go on more than half of public homes within four years. The party costs the loans at about $429 million over four years and says its wider energy package would be paid for by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes. The biggest tradeoff: borrowers pay no interest, but the government pays it over loans of 15 to 30 years, beyond the four years costed.

  • Labour

    Government-backed solar loans, a subsidy of up to $3,000, and plug-in panels for renters.Labour's SolarSaver would offer two government-backed loans: one through lines companies at no more than the regulated cost of capital (about 6.5%, Megan Woods says), repaid on the power bill, and one through a council scheme repaid through rates, which Labour says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates; no rate has been published. Labour says repayments would be set below expected bill savings. Low- and middle-income homeowners and renters could get a subsidy of up to $3,000. Renters could use plug-in panels after a rule change. There would also be a $30 million community battery fund and free EECA advice. Labour costs the package at $160 million over four years, from the government's Gas Security Fund. The biggest tradeoff: the subsidy lowers upfront costs for some households, but it uses money set aside for gas field investment, and who qualifies is unpublished.

  • Opportunity

    Council-run loans for home electrification, and solar for low-income homes.Opportunity would set up a national Ratepayer Assistance Scheme run by local government, offering loans the party describes as low-interest for home electrification, tied to each rateable property. The party says the debt, borrowed through the Local Government Funding Agency, would sit off council and government books. It would also double the Warmer Kiwi Homes programme to about $200 million a year and extend it to solar and electric appliances for low-income households, and co-invest in community-owned generation and storage of up to 15 MW. The party puts the cost of running the loans at about $6 million a year, paid, with the rest of its energy plan, from Crown power company dividends of about $500 million a year. Loan rates, terms and a start date are not published. The biggest tradeoff: the plan uses existing dividends, but that money would no longer be available for other government spending.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    $1 billion fund for Māori and community energy; solar finance and payment for exported power.Te Pāti Māori's 2026 policy manifesto would set up a $1 billion Energy Sovereignty Fund offering grants, concessional finance, guarantees, equity and co-investment, investing in reducing household energy costs, marae and papakāinga resilience, Māori-owned renewable generation, and community batteries and microgrids. It would support access to solar and batteries through "long-term, low-cost and zero-interest finance" and the Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, a council loan model, and would set a "fair-value framework" so households are "properly paid" for power they send back to the grid. Its climate section adds a $1 billion Pūngao Auaha Fund to put solar and insulation on marae, kura, papakāinga and housing. It has not published who would provide the finance, how export payments would be set, a funding source or a start date. The biggest tradeoff: communities would take ownership stakes in energy, but how much of the money would reach individual households is not known.

Allow plug-in solar and remove rules3 parties

  • Green

    Homeowner loans with government-paid interest, solar on public homes, and plug-in solar rights for renters.The Greens would set up a loan scheme, owned 20% by central government and 80% by councils and the Local Government Funding Agency, offering homeowners loans over 15 to 30 years for solar, batteries and other electrification. The government would pay the interest. Loans would be tied to the property and repaid through a levy; some owners could defer repayment until they sell. Renters would get a right to plug-in solar, and solar would go on more than half of public homes within four years. The party costs the loans at about $429 million over four years and says its wider energy package would be paid for by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes. The biggest tradeoff: borrowers pay no interest, but the government pays it over loans of 15 to 30 years, beyond the four years costed.

  • Labour

    Government-backed solar loans, a subsidy of up to $3,000, and plug-in panels for renters.Labour's SolarSaver would offer two government-backed loans: one through lines companies at no more than the regulated cost of capital (about 6.5%, Megan Woods says), repaid on the power bill, and one through a council scheme repaid through rates, which Labour says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates; no rate has been published. Labour says repayments would be set below expected bill savings. Low- and middle-income homeowners and renters could get a subsidy of up to $3,000. Renters could use plug-in panels after a rule change. There would also be a $30 million community battery fund and free EECA advice. Labour costs the package at $160 million over four years, from the government's Gas Security Fund. The biggest tradeoff: the subsidy lowers upfront costs for some households, but it uses money set aside for gas field investment, and who qualifies is unpublished.

  • National

    10-year government and council loans repaid through rates, and rooftop solar without a consent.National's Home Energy Fund would be a lending platform owned by central government and the councils that choose to join. It would pay an approved installer upfront, and the homeowner would repay the loan over ten years through their rates, or when they sell; a National spokesperson put the rate at about 2% below floating. Loans would cover solar, batteries and other electrification, for ratepayers with at least 20% equity in their home. The Crown would put in $7 million for a 20% share; councils and the Local Government Funding Agency would provide the rest. Its planning reforms would also let owners install rooftop solar without a consent. No start date has been given. The biggest tradeoff: ratepayers with enough equity could spread the cost over ten years, but renters, owners with less equity and those in councils that do not join would miss out.

Change what households are paid for exported power5 parties

  • ACT

    No subsidies; households could sell power to other buyers and export more where networks allow.ACT opposes solar subsidies; energy spokesperson Simon Court says "if solar stacks up, Kiwis are going to invest without handouts". Its election policy would let households sell the power they generate to a different company from the one they buy from, or to local businesses and community schemes, with metering, network charges and consumer protections. It would allow households to export more power where the network has room, make lines companies explain and justify restrictions, and require them to test major upgrades against options such as batteries. ACT has not published a cost or start date. The biggest tradeoff: ACT proposes no public spending on household solar, so households would still pay the upfront cost themselves; it has not said who would bear network costs from more exports.

  • Green

    Homeowner loans with government-paid interest, solar on public homes, and plug-in solar rights for renters.The Greens would set up a loan scheme, owned 20% by central government and 80% by councils and the Local Government Funding Agency, offering homeowners loans over 15 to 30 years for solar, batteries and other electrification. The government would pay the interest. Loans would be tied to the property and repaid through a levy; some owners could defer repayment until they sell. Renters would get a right to plug-in solar, and solar would go on more than half of public homes within four years. The party costs the loans at about $429 million over four years and says its wider energy package would be paid for by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes. The biggest tradeoff: borrowers pay no interest, but the government pays it over loans of 15 to 30 years, beyond the four years costed.

  • Labour

    Government-backed solar loans, a subsidy of up to $3,000, and plug-in panels for renters.Labour's SolarSaver would offer two government-backed loans: one through lines companies at no more than the regulated cost of capital (about 6.5%, Megan Woods says), repaid on the power bill, and one through a council scheme repaid through rates, which Labour says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates; no rate has been published. Labour says repayments would be set below expected bill savings. Low- and middle-income homeowners and renters could get a subsidy of up to $3,000. Renters could use plug-in panels after a rule change. There would also be a $30 million community battery fund and free EECA advice. Labour costs the package at $160 million over four years, from the government's Gas Security Fund. The biggest tradeoff: the subsidy lowers upfront costs for some households, but it uses money set aside for gas field investment, and who qualifies is unpublished.

  • NZ First

    Pay home solar owners the same price for exported power as they pay.NZ First's main electricity policy would split the large power companies into separate generators and retailers. Within it, the party says "if you generate power at home like solar, you should be able to sell it back to the grid at the same price you pay for it". It has not said how that price would be set. NZ First has not proposed loans or subsidies for household solar. Associate Energy Minister Shane Jones gives the party's reason: "we're not keen on individual houses, because we fear middle class capture"; he prefers solar on marae, council buildings and large commercial roofs. No cost or start date has been published. The biggest tradeoff: solar owners would be paid more for exports, but with no design published it is unclear who would pay the difference.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    $1 billion fund for Māori and community energy; solar finance and payment for exported power.Te Pāti Māori's 2026 policy manifesto would set up a $1 billion Energy Sovereignty Fund offering grants, concessional finance, guarantees, equity and co-investment, investing in reducing household energy costs, marae and papakāinga resilience, Māori-owned renewable generation, and community batteries and microgrids. It would support access to solar and batteries through "long-term, low-cost and zero-interest finance" and the Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, a council loan model, and would set a "fair-value framework" so households are "properly paid" for power they send back to the grid. Its climate section adds a $1 billion Pūngao Auaha Fund to put solar and insulation on marae, kura, papakāinga and housing. It has not published who would provide the finance, how export payments would be set, a funding source or a start date. The biggest tradeoff: communities would take ownership stakes in energy, but how much of the money would reach individual households is not known.

Fund community and Māori-owned energy4 parties

  • Green

    Homeowner loans with government-paid interest, solar on public homes, and plug-in solar rights for renters.The Greens would set up a loan scheme, owned 20% by central government and 80% by councils and the Local Government Funding Agency, offering homeowners loans over 15 to 30 years for solar, batteries and other electrification. The government would pay the interest. Loans would be tied to the property and repaid through a levy; some owners could defer repayment until they sell. Renters would get a right to plug-in solar, and solar would go on more than half of public homes within four years. The party costs the loans at about $429 million over four years and says its wider energy package would be paid for by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes. The biggest tradeoff: borrowers pay no interest, but the government pays it over loans of 15 to 30 years, beyond the four years costed.

  • Labour

    Government-backed solar loans, a subsidy of up to $3,000, and plug-in panels for renters.Labour's SolarSaver would offer two government-backed loans: one through lines companies at no more than the regulated cost of capital (about 6.5%, Megan Woods says), repaid on the power bill, and one through a council scheme repaid through rates, which Labour says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates; no rate has been published. Labour says repayments would be set below expected bill savings. Low- and middle-income homeowners and renters could get a subsidy of up to $3,000. Renters could use plug-in panels after a rule change. There would also be a $30 million community battery fund and free EECA advice. Labour costs the package at $160 million over four years, from the government's Gas Security Fund. The biggest tradeoff: the subsidy lowers upfront costs for some households, but it uses money set aside for gas field investment, and who qualifies is unpublished.

  • Opportunity

    Council-run loans for home electrification, and solar for low-income homes.Opportunity would set up a national Ratepayer Assistance Scheme run by local government, offering loans the party describes as low-interest for home electrification, tied to each rateable property. The party says the debt, borrowed through the Local Government Funding Agency, would sit off council and government books. It would also double the Warmer Kiwi Homes programme to about $200 million a year and extend it to solar and electric appliances for low-income households, and co-invest in community-owned generation and storage of up to 15 MW. The party puts the cost of running the loans at about $6 million a year, paid, with the rest of its energy plan, from Crown power company dividends of about $500 million a year. Loan rates, terms and a start date are not published. The biggest tradeoff: the plan uses existing dividends, but that money would no longer be available for other government spending.

  • Te Pāti Māori

    $1 billion fund for Māori and community energy; solar finance and payment for exported power.Te Pāti Māori's 2026 policy manifesto would set up a $1 billion Energy Sovereignty Fund offering grants, concessional finance, guarantees, equity and co-investment, investing in reducing household energy costs, marae and papakāinga resilience, Māori-owned renewable generation, and community batteries and microgrids. It would support access to solar and batteries through "long-term, low-cost and zero-interest finance" and the Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, a council loan model, and would set a "fair-value framework" so households are "properly paid" for power they send back to the grid. Its climate section adds a $1 billion Pūngao Auaha Fund to put solar and insulation on marae, kura, papakāinga and housing. It has not published who would provide the finance, how export payments would be set, a funding source or a start date. The biggest tradeoff: communities would take ownership stakes in energy, but how much of the money would reach individual households is not known.

Each party's whole answer, under the same headings for every party.

ACT

No subsidies; households could sell power to other buyers and export more where networks allow.ACT opposes solar subsidies; energy spokesperson Simon Court says "if solar stacks up, Kiwis are going to invest without handouts". Its election policy would let households sell the power they generate to a different company from the one they buy from, or to local businesses and community schemes, with metering, network charges and consumer protections. It would allow households to export more power where the network has room, make lines companies explain and justify restrictions, and require them to test major upgrades against options such as batteries. ACT has not published a cost or start date. The biggest tradeoff: ACT proposes no public spending on household solar, so households would still pay the upfront cost themselves; it has not said who would bear network costs from more exports.

How it works
Not stated
Who qualifies
Not stated
What it covers
Not stated
Extras
Not stated
Cost and funding
Not stated
Start
Not stated

Green

Homeowner loans with government-paid interest, solar on public homes, and plug-in solar rights for renters.The Greens would set up a loan scheme, owned 20% by central government and 80% by councils and the Local Government Funding Agency, offering homeowners loans over 15 to 30 years for solar, batteries and other electrification. The government would pay the interest. Loans would be tied to the property and repaid through a levy; some owners could defer repayment until they sell. Renters would get a right to plug-in solar, and solar would go on more than half of public homes within four years. The party costs the loans at about $429 million over four years and says its wider energy package would be paid for by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes. The biggest tradeoff: borrowers pay no interest, but the government pays it over loans of 15 to 30 years, beyond the four years costed.

How it works
Zero-interest loans over 15 to 30 years, tied to the property and repaid through a separate levy; some owners can defer repayment until sale. The government pays the interest.Zero-interest loans over 15 to 30 years, tied to the property and repaid through a separate levy; some owners can defer repayment until sale. The government pays the interest.
Who qualifies
Homeowners with rateable property; the party says up to 90% of homeowners. Renters get a right to plug-in solarHomeowners with rateable property; the party says up to 90% of homeowners. Renters get a right to plug-in solar
What it covers
Rooftop solar, batteries, energy efficiency and electrification upgradesRooftop solar, batteries, energy efficiency and electrification upgrades
Extras
Solar on more than half of public homes within four years; $200m community energy; $80m Māori housing renewables; plug-in solar; fair export pricesSolar on more than half of public homes within four years; $200m community energy; $80m Māori housing renewables; plug-in solar; fair export prices
Cost and funding
About $429m over four years for the loans (party estimate); wider package funded by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changesAbout $429m over four years for the loans (party estimate); wider package funded by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes
Start
Loans running within six months of entering government (party claim)Loans running within six months of entering government (party claim)

Labour

Government-backed solar loans, a subsidy of up to $3,000, and plug-in panels for renters.Labour's SolarSaver would offer two government-backed loans: one through lines companies at no more than the regulated cost of capital (about 6.5%, Megan Woods says), repaid on the power bill, and one through a council scheme repaid through rates, which Labour says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates; no rate has been published. Labour says repayments would be set below expected bill savings. Low- and middle-income homeowners and renters could get a subsidy of up to $3,000. Renters could use plug-in panels after a rule change. There would also be a $30 million community battery fund and free EECA advice. Labour costs the package at $160 million over four years, from the government's Gas Security Fund. The biggest tradeoff: the subsidy lowers upfront costs for some households, but it uses money set aside for gas field investment, and who qualifies is unpublished.

How it works
Government-backed loans through lines companies (at no more than the regulated cost of capital, put at about 6.5%; repaid on the power bill) or a council rates scheme Megan Woods says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates (no rate published); repayments set below expected bill savingsGovernment-backed loans through lines companies (at no more than the regulated cost of capital, put at about 6.5%; repaid on the power bill) or a council rates scheme Megan Woods says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates (no rate published); repayments set below expected bill savings
Who qualifies
Homeowners; renters through plug-in panels; subsidy of up to $3,000 for low- and middle-income homeowners and renters (income limits not published)Homeowners; renters through plug-in panels; subsidy of up to $3,000 for low- and middle-income homeowners and renters (income limits not published)
What it covers
Solar and batteries; the council scheme also covers heat pumps and other electrificationSolar and batteries; the council scheme also covers heat pumps and other electrification
Extras
$30m community battery fund; free EECA advice service; plug-in solar; fair time-of-use export rates; $4m workforce coordination$30m community battery fund; free EECA advice service; plug-in solar; fair time-of-use export rates; $4m workforce coordination
Cost and funding
$160m over four years (party estimate), from the Gas Security Fund$160m over four years (party estimate), from the Gas Security Fund
Start
Subsidies, loans and advice service within 12 months of taking officeSubsidies, loans and advice service within 12 months of taking office

National

10-year government and council loans repaid through rates, and rooftop solar without a consent.National's Home Energy Fund would be a lending platform owned by central government and the councils that choose to join. It would pay an approved installer upfront, and the homeowner would repay the loan over ten years through their rates, or when they sell; a National spokesperson put the rate at about 2% below floating. Loans would cover solar, batteries and other electrification, for ratepayers with at least 20% equity in their home. The Crown would put in $7 million for a 20% share; councils and the Local Government Funding Agency would provide the rest. Its planning reforms would also let owners install rooftop solar without a consent. No start date has been given. The biggest tradeoff: ratepayers with enough equity could spread the cost over ten years, but renters, owners with less equity and those in councils that do not join would miss out.

How it works
10-year loans from a government and council platform that pays the installer upfront, at about 2% below floating rates (party spokesperson); repaid through rates or on sale10-year loans from a government and council platform that pays the installer upfront, at about 2% below floating rates (party spokesperson); repaid through rates or on sale
Who qualifies
Ratepayers with at least 20% equity, in councils that choose to joinRatepayers with at least 20% equity, in councils that choose to join
What it covers
Solar, batteries, insulation, heat pumps and other electrificationSolar, batteries, insulation, heat pumps and other electrification
Extras
Rooftop solar without a resource consent; small farm solar, batteries and micro-hydro permitted; plug-in panels on sale within six monthsRooftop solar without a resource consent; small farm solar, batteries and micro-hydro permitted; plug-in panels on sale within six months
Cost and funding
$7m one-off Crown equity for a 20% share; councils and the Local Government Funding Agency fund the rest$7m one-off Crown equity for a 20% share; councils and the Local Government Funding Agency fund the rest
Start
Not stated; needs a Local Government Act amendmentNot stated; needs a Local Government Act amendment

NZ First

Pay home solar owners the same price for exported power as they pay.NZ First's main electricity policy would split the large power companies into separate generators and retailers. Within it, the party says "if you generate power at home like solar, you should be able to sell it back to the grid at the same price you pay for it". It has not said how that price would be set. NZ First has not proposed loans or subsidies for household solar. Associate Energy Minister Shane Jones gives the party's reason: "we're not keen on individual houses, because we fear middle class capture"; he prefers solar on marae, council buildings and large commercial roofs. No cost or start date has been published. The biggest tradeoff: solar owners would be paid more for exports, but with no design published it is unclear who would pay the difference.

How it works
Not stated
Who qualifies
Not stated
What it covers
Not stated
Extras
Not stated
Cost and funding
Not stated
Start
Not stated

Opportunity

Council-run loans for home electrification, and solar for low-income homes.Opportunity would set up a national Ratepayer Assistance Scheme run by local government, offering loans the party describes as low-interest for home electrification, tied to each rateable property. The party says the debt, borrowed through the Local Government Funding Agency, would sit off council and government books. It would also double the Warmer Kiwi Homes programme to about $200 million a year and extend it to solar and electric appliances for low-income households, and co-invest in community-owned generation and storage of up to 15 MW. The party puts the cost of running the loans at about $6 million a year, paid, with the rest of its energy plan, from Crown power company dividends of about $500 million a year. Loan rates, terms and a start date are not published. The biggest tradeoff: the plan uses existing dividends, but that money would no longer be available for other government spending.

How it works
Loans the party calls low-interest (rate not published) through a national council-run Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, tied to the property; councils borrow through the Local Government Funding AgencyLoans the party calls low-interest (rate not published) through a national council-run Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, tied to the property; councils borrow through the Local Government Funding Agency
Who qualifies
Rateable properties (eligibility not specified); low-income households through Warmer Kiwi HomesRateable properties (eligibility not specified); low-income households through Warmer Kiwi Homes
What it covers
Electrification loans; solar and electric appliances for low-income homes through Warmer Kiwi HomesElectrification loans; solar and electric appliances for low-income homes through Warmer Kiwi Homes
Extras
Government co-investment in community-owned generation and storage up to 15 MWGovernment co-investment in community-owned generation and storage up to 15 MW
Cost and funding
About $6m a year to run the loans and about $200m a year for Warmer Kiwi Homes (party estimates), from power company dividendsAbout $6m a year to run the loans and about $200m a year for Warmer Kiwi Homes (party estimates), from power company dividends
Start
Not stated; Warmer Kiwi Homes expansion funded from 2028/29Not stated; Warmer Kiwi Homes expansion funded from 2028/29

Te Pāti Māori

$1 billion fund for Māori and community energy; solar finance and payment for exported power.Te Pāti Māori's 2026 policy manifesto would set up a $1 billion Energy Sovereignty Fund offering grants, concessional finance, guarantees, equity and co-investment, investing in reducing household energy costs, marae and papakāinga resilience, Māori-owned renewable generation, and community batteries and microgrids. It would support access to solar and batteries through "long-term, low-cost and zero-interest finance" and the Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, a council loan model, and would set a "fair-value framework" so households are "properly paid" for power they send back to the grid. Its climate section adds a $1 billion Pūngao Auaha Fund to put solar and insulation on marae, kura, papakāinga and housing. It has not published who would provide the finance, how export payments would be set, a funding source or a start date. The biggest tradeoff: communities would take ownership stakes in energy, but how much of the money would reach individual households is not known.

How it works
Not stated
Who qualifies
Not stated
What it covers
Not stated
Extras
Not stated
Cost and funding
Not stated
Start
Not stated
Background and sources

Uptake and cost. National says 3% of households have solar, against about 9% in the US and one in three in Australia (National). EECA estimates a small to medium rooftop system costs $8,500 to $11,500, a battery $5,000 to $15,000, and that solar saves about $1,000 a year on average (1News). The Sustainable Energy Association (SEANZ) says installation costs fell 33% between 2019 and 2025 while power bills rose 23% (The Spinoff).

What officials advised. Released briefings show officials studied Australian-style rebates. RNZ reports they found upfront cost was the dominant barrier, that uptake was mostly among households able to finance it themselves, and that rebates accelerate uptake. They also flagged Australia's experience of midday exports "causing congestion and other network infrastructure upgrade needs". In October 2025 the government chose consenting and technical changes instead, which its own impact statement said had an incentive effect "not clear and expected to be minor" (RNZ via ODT).

The council loan model. Local Government New Zealand's Ratepayer Assistance Scheme would let councils borrow cheaply through the Local Government Funding Agency and lend to homeowners, off council balance sheets, with repayments through rates. It needs a law change and about $7 million of Crown equity, and LGNZ expects it could be running 12 to 18 months after the law is changed and councils join (LGNZ). Existing low- or no-interest bank green loans are open only to mortgage holders, which LGNZ told 1News excludes about 80% of people, including renters and retirees without a mortgage (1News; RNZ via Now.Solar). The Greens, Labour, National, Opportunity and Te Pāti Māori all back a version of it (RNZ via ODT; Opportunity).

Rule changes already under way. A Ministry for Regulation review ordered by Regulation Minister and ACT leader David Seymour recommended legalising plug-in solar, moving to risk-based inspections and exempting more systems from resource consent. The government says a typical home approval would fall from about $640 and three months to $200 and six days, and the ministry estimates net benefits of $28 million to about $50 million over 10 years (Ministry for Regulation). The government agreed on 17 August 2026 to progress the recommendations (National), which the ministry expects to take up to 18 months (The Spinoff). Every party proposing plug-in solar is therefore building on a change already agreed.

Effects on the grid. Modelling commissioned by MBIE found very high rooftop solar uptake could bring very low summer prices and more volatile winter prices, and that network investment needs would likely be substantial if exports and peak demand were unmanaged, and that active management, including batteries, could substantially reduce it (MBIE).

ACT

ACT opposes solar subsidies; energy spokesperson Simon Court says "if solar stacks up, Kiwis are going to invest without handouts". Its election policy would let households sell the power they generate to a different company from the one they buy from, or to local businesses and community schemes, with metering, network charges and consumer protections. It would allow households to export more power where the network has room, make lines companies explain and justify restrictions, and require them to test major upgrades against options such as batteries. ACT has not published a cost or start date. The biggest tradeoff: ACT proposes no public spending on household solar, so households would still pay the upfront cost themselves; it has not said who would bear network costs from more exports.

Who gains

  • Party claimHouseholds with or considering solar, who ACT says "face barriers to selling the power they make", through more buyers for their exported power and more exports where the network has room. [1]

Who pays

  • Established evidenceACT has not proposed public spending on household solar, and has not said how network upgrade costs from more exports would be shared. [1][3]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Established evidenceACT has not published a cost for its export and selling proposals. [1]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Established evidenceRNZ reports that released officials' briefings found upfront cost was the dominant barrier, that uptake was mostly among households able to finance it themselves, and that rebates accelerate uptake; in October 2025 the government chose consenting and technical changes instead. [5]
  • Established evidenceOn export pricing generally, solar owners say they are paid less for the power they export than they pay to draw power from the grid. In 2025 the Electricity Authority consulted on a separate proposal for lines companies to pay households a rebate for exported power. [6]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceOfficials flagged Australia's experience of midday solar exports "causing congestion and other network infrastructure upgrade needs"; MBIE-commissioned modelling found network investment would likely be substantial if exports and peak demand are unmanaged, and that active management, including batteries, could substantially reduce it. ACT would allow more exports "where the network has room" and require lines companies to test major upgrades against options such as batteries. [5][7][1]

Implementation

  • Party claimACT says sales to other buyers would come with "proper metering, network charges and consumer protections". [1]
  • Established evidenceACT has not given a start date for its export and selling proposals. [1]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimACT says regulatory barriers, not a lack of subsidies, hold solar back. More generally, the Taxpayers' Union, criticising Labour's plan, says subsidies make families "who can't afford solar" "subsidise those who can". [1][3][8]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedNo named critic of ACT's solar plan was found. More generally, Electricity Networks Aotearoa's Tracey Kai was concerned that the Electricity Authority's 2025 export rebate proposal, not ACT's plan, would benefit those who can afford solar. [6]
  1. Abundant and Affordable Electricity · ACT New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  2. ACT says it won't split up power companies (RNZ, 18 September 2026) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  3. Which political parties would subsidise your rooftop solar panels? (RNZ, 15 April 2026) · RNZ (republished by Now.Solar) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  4. Government prioritises Solar Review (17 August 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  5. Govt 'kicked the tyres' on solar subsidies but went with 'minor' tweaks (RNZ) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  6. Nine to Noon, 17 February 2025: Moves to pay more for consumer-generated electricity · RNZ · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  7. Modelling the impacts of high solar and battery uptake on the electricity market · Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  8. Labour solar subsidies are costly corporate welfare (8 July 2026) · New Zealand Taxpayers' Union · accessed 15 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 17 Oct 2026 Stated the MBIE grid modelling finding as conditionally as the report does, in the same words for every party. [7]
  2. 16 Oct 2026 Final review round; removed the plug-in-and-fewer-rules tag and moved the review to the deep text as a government decision, so ACT is tagged only for its own election proposals; removed the SEANZ and review items from evidence. [4]
  3. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fifth agent review; put ACT's own reforms first and the review in neutral words, said plainly that the Kai concern was about a different proposal, added the Taxpayers' Union's general argument to the case for, cited the Ministry for Regulation report for its estimate, and typed the SEANZ and export-price items as industry and solar-owner claims. Ministry for Regulation[8][6]
  4. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fourth agent review; matched the export wording to ACT's page, stated the review link once, restated the biggest tradeoff, added the review and SEANZ evidence given to every plug-in proposer, added ACT's network test to the grid risk, gave ACT's reasoning in the case for and used an export-pricing critic in the case against. [1][4][6]
  5. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after third agent review; stated plainly that Seymour ordered the review and ACT's policy adds export and selling reforms, restated the biggest tradeoff from ACT's design, removed the review and SEANZ figures from evidence, split party statements from absences, and rebuilt the case for and against. [1] The Spinoff[5]
  6. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after second agent review; removed the government review from ACT's glance, gains, costing and case for, restated the biggest tradeoff from ACT's design, added export-pricing evidence and a named supporter, and labelled the case against as general criticism. [1][8][6]
  7. 15 Oct 2026 Revised after agent review; separated the government's solar review from ACT's own proposals and added grid and evidence items. [1][5]
  8. 15 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1][3]

Green

The Greens would set up a loan scheme, owned 20% by central government and 80% by councils and the Local Government Funding Agency, offering homeowners loans over 15 to 30 years for solar, batteries and other electrification. The government would pay the interest. Loans would be tied to the property and repaid through a levy; some owners could defer repayment until they sell. Renters would get a right to plug-in solar, and solar would go on more than half of public homes within four years. The party costs the loans at about $429 million over four years and says its wider energy package would be paid for by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes. The biggest tradeoff: borrowers pay no interest, but the government pays it over loans of 15 to 30 years, beyond the four years costed.

Policies: Zero-interest clean energy loans (Power for All of Us)

Who gains

  • Party claimHomeowners who borrow at zero interest, renters through plug-in solar, public housing tenants, and Māori housing through an $80 million renewable energy fund. [1][2]

Who pays

  • Party claimTaxpayers pay the interest; borrowers repay the loan itself. The party says its energy package would be funded by its proposed wealth tax and other tax changes. [2][5]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Party claim$421.2 million in operating costs and $7.5 million in capital over four years for the loans. [2][4]
  • Party claimInfometrics, commissioned by the party, reviewed the assumptions behind the package costings and said they "appear to be reasonable assessments, conditional on the underpinning assumptions". [5]
  • Established evidenceInfometrics did not model the proposals itself, so this is not an independent costing. [5]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Established evidenceRNZ reports that released officials' briefings found upfront cost was the dominant barrier, that uptake was mostly among households able to finance it themselves, and that rebates accelerate uptake; in October 2025 the government chose consenting and technical changes instead. [6]
  • Independent estimateThe Ministry for Regulation's review behind the agreed plug-in solar change estimates net benefits of $28 million to about $50 million over 10 years. [15]
  • Party claimThe government says the review's changes would cut a typical home approval from about $640 and three months to $200 and six days. [10]
  • Party claimThe party says a fully electric home with solar could save up to $1,000 a year, and plug-in solar up to $350. [2]

Risks and side effects

  • Party claimThe party's cost model assumes a 4.25% interest rate paid down to zero and 80% of new installs joining, so the cost would change if rates or uptake differ. Its cost table covers four years; the loans run for 15 to 30 years. [2][4]
  • Established evidenceThe loans are for homeowners, and a council-backed scheme depends on councils taking part; renters would benefit through the plug-in solar right and solar on public homes. [2][4][11][14]
  • Established evidenceOfficials flagged Australia's experience of midday solar exports "causing congestion and other network infrastructure upgrade needs"; MBIE-commissioned modelling found network investment would likely be substantial if exports and peak demand are unmanaged, and that active management, including batteries, could substantially reduce it. The loans also cover batteries. [6][7][2]

Implementation

  • Party claimThe party says the scheme could run within six months. [2]
  • Established evidenceA council-backed loan scheme needs a law change and councils choosing to take part; LGNZ expects a council loan scheme could be running 12 to 18 months after the law is changed and councils join. [8][11][14]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimChlöe Swarbrick says "every month waiting is another month families pay more than they need to for the basics". More generally, LGNZ calls council-backed loans "one of the most effective ways" to help. [3][12]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedNo named critic of the Greens' solar plan was found. More generally, ACT does not support solar subsidies, and the Taxpayers' Union says Labour's subsidies would make families "who can't afford solar" "subsidise those who can". [9][13]
  1. Power for All of Us · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  2. The Greens' Full Power Policy: Energy Policy 2026 · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  3. Green Party calls on Parliament to get on with solar loans before election (8 July 2026) · Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  4. Greens propose zero-interest clean energy loans and $200 million investment (20 July 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  5. Greens pledge 'Kiwipower' to boost renewables and cut power bills (20 July 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026 · archived copy (17 Oct 2026)
  6. Govt 'kicked the tyres' on solar subsidies but went with 'minor' tweaks (RNZ) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  7. Modelling the impacts of high solar and battery uptake on the electricity market · Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  8. Council loans for rooftop solar waiting on Govt green light (19 May 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  9. National pledges low-cost loans for solar power (RNZ, 25 June 2026) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  10. Government prioritises Solar Review (17 August 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  11. Ratepayer Assistance Scheme · Local Government New Zealand · accessed 16 Oct 2026
  12. LGNZ welcomes Labour's SolarSaver election policy (8 July 2026) · Local Government New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  13. Labour solar subsidies are costly corporate welfare (8 July 2026) · New Zealand Taxpayers' Union · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  14. Council loans for rooftop solar still waiting on government green light (RNZ, 19 May 2026) · RNZ (republished by Now.Solar) · accessed 16 Oct 2026
  15. Solar Regulatory Review: full report (July 2026) · Ministry for Regulation · accessed 16 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 17 Oct 2026 Stated the MBIE grid modelling finding as conditionally as the report does, in the same words for every party. [7]
  2. 16 Oct 2026 Final review round; removed the SEANZ item and the tax-funding risk, which went further than other parties' funding sources get, and cited the sources that say councils opt in. [11]
  3. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fifth agent review; added risks on the unchecked tax funding and on homeowner-only loans (given to every homeowner-tied loan), cited the Ministry for Regulation report, and typed the SEANZ figure as an industry claim; figures re-checked against the party's policy PDF. [2] Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand[15]
  4. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fourth agent review; described the interest arrangement and renters' right in the glance, added the review and SEANZ evidence given to every plug-in proposer, cited LGNZ's own page for its timing estimate, added an LGNZ supporter and the Taxpayers' Union's general argument. [11][12][13]
  5. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after third agent review; restated the biggest tradeoff and the cost risk from the party's model, added plug-in context, standardised the officials' evidence, split party statements from established facts, and used the no-named-critic form for the case against. [2][4][9]
  6. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after second agent review; replaced the wealth-tax point in the case against with named criticism of subsidised solar. RNZ (republished by Now.Solar)[13]
  7. 15 Oct 2026 Revised after agent review; relabelled the party-commissioned Infometrics review, added grid and start-time caveats, and replaced the case for and against. [2]
  8. 15 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1][2]

Labour

Labour's SolarSaver would offer two government-backed loans: one through lines companies at no more than the regulated cost of capital (about 6.5%, Megan Woods says), repaid on the power bill, and one through a council scheme repaid through rates, which Labour says was designed to offer rates below bank floating rates; no rate has been published. Labour says repayments would be set below expected bill savings. Low- and middle-income homeowners and renters could get a subsidy of up to $3,000. Renters could use plug-in panels after a rule change. There would also be a $30 million community battery fund and free EECA advice. Labour costs the package at $160 million over four years, from the government's Gas Security Fund. The biggest tradeoff: the subsidy lowers upfront costs for some households, but it uses money set aside for gas field investment, and who qualifies is unpublished.

Policies: SolarSaver

Who gains

  • Party claimHouseholds that cannot get a bank green loan (Megan Woods says "four out of five households currently cannot access a standard bank green loan"), renters through plug-in panels, and low- and middle-income households through the subsidy. [1][2]

Who pays

  • Party claimLabour says the $160 million would come from repurposing the government's Gas Security Fund, which it says is "almost entirely unspent". Borrowers repay their loans through the power bill or rates. [1][4]
  • Established evidenceThe fund was set up in Budget 2025 with $200 million over four years, originally for Crown co-investment in new gas field development. [10]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Party claim$160 million over four years: $77 million subsidies, $30 million community batteries, $22 million EECA, $20 million loan underwrite, $7 million to set up the council scheme and $4 million for workforce coordination. [1][4]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Established evidenceRNZ reports that released officials' briefings found upfront cost was the dominant barrier, that uptake was mostly among households able to finance it themselves, and that rebates accelerate uptake; in October 2025 the government chose consenting and technical changes instead. [6]
  • Independent estimateThe Ministry for Regulation's review behind the agreed plug-in solar change estimates net benefits of $28 million to about $50 million over 10 years. [14]
  • Party claimThe government says the review's changes would cut a typical home approval from about $640 and three months to $200 and six days. [11]
  • Party claimSEANZ and Rewiring Aotearoa modelling cited by Labour estimates savings of about $1,000 a year under the council scheme and $750 under lines company loans. [4]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceIncome limits for the subsidy have not been published. [1]
  • Established evidenceBoth loans are for homeowners, and the council scheme depends on councils taking part; renters would benefit through plug-in panels and the subsidy. [1][12][13]
  • Established evidenceLabour has not said how large a loan book the $20 million Crown underwrite would cover or what happens if borrowers default. [1][4]
  • Established evidenceOfficials flagged Australia's experience of midday solar exports "causing congestion and other network infrastructure upgrade needs"; MBIE-commissioned modelling found network investment would likely be substantial if exports and peak demand are unmanaged, and that active management, including batteries, could substantially reduce it. Labour's plan includes a $30 million community battery fund. [6][7][1]

Implementation

  • Party claimLabour says the subsidies, loans and advice service would run within 12 months of taking office. [1]
  • Established evidenceThe council scheme needs a law change and councils choosing to take part; LGNZ expects a council loan scheme could be running 12 to 18 months after the law is changed and councils join. [8][12][13]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimChris Hipkins says renewable energy is the cheapest electricity but "too many households are locked out by the initial cost". LGNZ calls the council loan scheme "one of the most effective ways" to help. [3][4][5]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedNational's Simeon Brown calls it "essentially National's policy with a bigger price tag". James Ross of the Taxpayers' Union says families "who can't afford solar" would "subsidise those who can". [3][9]
  1. SolarSaver: Solar without the upfront cost · New Zealand Labour Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  2. Labour to make power bills more affordable with SolarSaver (8 July 2026) · New Zealand Labour Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  3. Labour wants solar 'for all' with $160m policy aimed at power bills (8 July 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  4. Labour promises low-interest rate schemes, subsidies and plug-in options for renters (8 July 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  5. LGNZ welcomes Labour's SolarSaver election policy (8 July 2026) · Local Government New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  6. Govt 'kicked the tyres' on solar subsidies but went with 'minor' tweaks (RNZ) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  7. Modelling the impacts of high solar and battery uptake on the electricity market · Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  8. Council loans for rooftop solar waiting on Govt green light (19 May 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  9. Labour solar subsidies are costly corporate welfare (8 July 2026) · New Zealand Taxpayers' Union · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  10. Gas Security Fund takes shape (12 November 2025) · Russell McVeagh · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  11. Government prioritises Solar Review (17 August 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  12. Ratepayer Assistance Scheme · Local Government New Zealand · accessed 16 Oct 2026
  13. Council loans for rooftop solar still waiting on government green light (RNZ, 19 May 2026) · RNZ (republished by Now.Solar) · accessed 16 Oct 2026
  14. Solar Regulatory Review: full report (July 2026) · Ministry for Regulation · accessed 16 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 17 Oct 2026 Stated the MBIE grid modelling finding as conditionally as the report does, in the same words for every party, and attributed the council scheme's design aim to Labour, as interest.co.nz does. [7]
  2. 17 Oct 2026 Quoted the SolarSaver page's promise on export rates, which the export-price tag rests on. [1]
  3. 16 Oct 2026 Final review round; removed the SEANZ item and cited the sources that say councils opt in. [12]
  4. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fifth agent review; added the homeowner-only loan risk given to every homeowner-tied loan, cited the Ministry for Regulation report, and typed the SEANZ figure as an industry claim. [1][14]
  5. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fourth agent review; used Woods's wording on the council scheme rate, added the Gas Security Fund's origin and purpose and a risk on the loan underwrite, restated the biggest tradeoff, removed a verification caveat no other party had, added the review and SEANZ evidence given to every plug-in proposer, and cited LGNZ's own page for its timing estimate. [4][10][12]
  6. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after third agent review; stated the loan rates in the summary, used Labour's wording for the $4 million line, removed the unsupported Budget 2025 origin and the Gas Security Fund aside, restated the biggest tradeoff, standardised the officials' evidence and added the LGNZ timing estimate. [1][4][8]
  7. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after second agent review; restated the biggest tradeoff from published facts, moved the Gas Security Fund approvals to dated context, and described the community batteries neutrally. [1] Kānoa – Regional Economic Development and Investment Unit (MBIE)
  8. 15 Oct 2026 Revised after agent review; restated the biggest tradeoff, attributed the funding source to Labour, consolidated the Gas Security Fund detail and added a grid risk. [1]
  9. 15 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1][4]

National

National's Home Energy Fund would be a lending platform owned by central government and the councils that choose to join. It would pay an approved installer upfront, and the homeowner would repay the loan over ten years through their rates, or when they sell; a National spokesperson put the rate at about 2% below floating. Loans would cover solar, batteries and other electrification, for ratepayers with at least 20% equity in their home. The Crown would put in $7 million for a 20% share; councils and the Local Government Funding Agency would provide the rest. Its planning reforms would also let owners install rooftop solar without a consent. No start date has been given. The biggest tradeoff: ratepayers with enough equity could spread the cost over ten years, but renters, owners with less equity and those in councils that do not join would miss out.

Policies: Home Energy Fund (Electrify NZ)

Who gains

  • Party claimHomeowners with enough equity, for whom Simon Watts says "the biggest barrier" is upfront cost. Nicola Willis says landlords would also have a "great incentive" to install solar. [3][5]

Who pays

  • Party claimNational says the Crown would put in $7 million and councils and the Local Government Funding Agency would provide the loan money. Borrowers repay through rates or on sale. [2][4]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Party claimA one-off $7 million Crown equity investment for a 20% share; a National spokesperson said the rate would be about 2% below floating rates. [2][4][5]
  • Established evidenceNo total size of the loan pool has been published. [2]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Party claimNational says 3% of households have solar, against about 9% in the US and one in three in Australia. [3]
  • Established evidenceRNZ reports that released officials' briefings found upfront cost was the dominant barrier, that uptake was mostly among households able to finance it themselves, and that rebates accelerate uptake; in October 2025 the government chose consenting and technical changes instead. [7]
  • Independent estimateThe Ministry for Regulation's review behind the agreed plug-in solar change estimates net benefits of $28 million to about $50 million over 10 years. [14]
  • Party claimThe government says the review's changes would cut a typical home approval from about $640 and three months to $200 and six days. [11]
  • Established evidenceLGNZ says existing low- or no-interest bank green loans are open only to mortgage holders. [8][13]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceRenters and owners with less than 20% equity cannot borrow, and because council participation is voluntary, the loans may not be offered everywhere. [2][5][12][13]
  • Established evidenceOfficials flagged Australia's experience of midday solar exports "causing congestion and other network infrastructure upgrade needs"; MBIE-commissioned modelling found network investment would likely be substantial if exports and peak demand are unmanaged, and that active management, including batteries, could substantially reduce it. The loans also cover batteries. [7][9][2]

Implementation

  • Established evidenceNeeds an amendment to the Local Government Act. LGNZ expects a council loan scheme could be running 12 to 18 months after the law is changed and councils join. No start date has been given. [2][8][12][13]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimSimon Watts says "the biggest barrier to solar, batteries and other home energy upgrades is the significant upfront cost". LGNZ says the scheme "would considerably help households struggling with the cost of living". [3][6]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedLabour's Megan Woods calls it "very narrow" because it mainly helps homeowners and misses the third of New Zealanders who rent. NZ First's Winston Peters says National's and Labour's solar policies "tinker around the edges". [5][10]
  1. Electrify NZ: Home Energy Fund · New Zealand National Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  2. Electrify NZ: Home Energy Fund policy document (June 2026) · New Zealand National Party (copy hosted by interest.co.nz) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  3. National to back cheaper, more resilient power (25 June 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  4. National pledges solar loans for homeowners, planning reforms (25 June 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  5. National promises low-interest, long-term solar power loans repaid through rates (25 June 2026) · interest.co.nz · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  6. LGNZ welcomes National's Home Energy Fund election policy (25 June 2026) · Local Government New Zealand · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  7. Govt 'kicked the tyres' on solar subsidies but went with 'minor' tweaks (RNZ) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  8. Council loans for rooftop solar waiting on Govt green light (19 May 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  9. Modelling the impacts of high solar and battery uptake on the electricity market · Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  10. Super-rich tax to fund $980m power company: Greens (20 July 2026) · Otago Daily Times · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  11. Government prioritises Solar Review (17 August 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  12. Ratepayer Assistance Scheme · Local Government New Zealand · accessed 16 Oct 2026
  13. Council loans for rooftop solar still waiting on government green light (RNZ, 19 May 2026) · RNZ (republished by Now.Solar) · accessed 16 Oct 2026
  14. Solar Regulatory Review: full report (July 2026) · Ministry for Regulation · accessed 16 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 17 Oct 2026 Stated the MBIE grid modelling finding as conditionally as the report does, in the same words for every party. [9]
  2. 16 Oct 2026 Final review round; removed the SEANZ item, cited the sources that say councils opt in, restated the biggest tradeoff from the scheme's design, and removed two campaign lines from the deep text. [12]
  3. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fifth agent review; matched the consent wording to the policy document, cited the Ministry for Regulation report, and typed the SEANZ figure as an industry claim; figures re-checked against the policy PDF. [2][14]
  4. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fourth agent review; added the review and SEANZ evidence given to every plug-in proposer and cited LGNZ's own page for its timing estimate. [11][12]
  5. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after third agent review; dropped the unqualified low-interest label from the glance, restated the biggest tradeoff, split the published cost from what is unpublished, and standardised the officials' evidence. [5][7]
  6. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after second agent review; added the spokesperson's expected interest rate to the summary and costing. [5]
  7. 15 Oct 2026 Revised after agent review; attributed the funding design to National and added a grid risk, matching other entries. [2]
  8. 15 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1][2]

NZ First

NZ First's main electricity policy would split the large power companies into separate generators and retailers. Within it, the party says "if you generate power at home like solar, you should be able to sell it back to the grid at the same price you pay for it". It has not said how that price would be set. NZ First has not proposed loans or subsidies for household solar. Associate Energy Minister Shane Jones gives the party's reason: "we're not keen on individual houses, because we fear middle class capture"; he prefers solar on marae, council buildings and large commercial roofs. No cost or start date has been published. The biggest tradeoff: solar owners would be paid more for exports, but with no design published it is unclear who would pay the difference.

Who gains

  • Party claimHouseholds with solar that export power, who NZ First says should be paid the same price they pay for electricity. [1]

Who pays

  • Established evidenceNZ First has not said who would fund the difference between current buy-back rates and the retail price. [1]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Established evidenceNZ First has not published a cost. [1]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Established evidenceRNZ reports that released officials' briefings found upfront cost was the dominant barrier, that uptake was mostly among households able to finance it themselves, and that rebates accelerate uptake; in October 2025 the government chose consenting and technical changes instead. [4]
  • Established evidenceSolar owners say they are paid less for the power they export than they pay to draw power from the grid. In 2025 the Electricity Authority consulted on a separate proposal for lines companies to pay households a rebate for exported power. [3]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceThe pledge does not say whether the "same price" includes lines and other charges that make up the retail price. [1]
  • Established evidenceOfficials flagged Australia's experience of midday solar exports "causing congestion and other network infrastructure upgrade needs"; MBIE-commissioned modelling found network investment would likely be substantial if exports and peak demand are unmanaged, and that active management, including batteries, could substantially reduce it. [4][5]

Implementation

  • Established evidenceThe pledge sits within the power company break-up and no timeline has been published. [1]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimNZ First says home solar owners "should be able to sell it back to the grid at the same price you pay for it", to put "power back into the hands of New Zealanders". [1]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedNo named critic of NZ First's solar plan was found. More generally, ACT's Simon Court says breaking up power companies, the policy's main plank, would "shatter the confidence of anyone seeking to invest in growing capacity". [6]
  1. Breaking up the Gentailers · New Zealand First · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  2. NZ First 'keen' on cowshed solar, not individual houses (11 June 2026) · CountryWide · accessed 15 Oct 2026 · archived copy (17 Oct 2026)
  3. Nine to Noon, 17 February 2025: Moves to pay more for consumer-generated electricity · RNZ · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  4. Govt 'kicked the tyres' on solar subsidies but went with 'minor' tweaks (RNZ) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  5. Modelling the impacts of high solar and battery uptake on the electricity market · Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  6. ACT says it won't split up power companies (RNZ, 18 September 2026) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  7. Peters announces proposal to overhaul energy sector (RNZ, 22 March 2026) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  8. Super-rich tax to fund $980m power company: Greens (20 July 2026) · Otago Daily Times · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  9. Government prioritises Solar Review (17 August 2026) · New Zealand National Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 17 Oct 2026 Stated the MBIE grid modelling finding as conditionally as the report does, in the same words for every party. [5]
  2. 17 Oct 2026 Added the government's August 2026 plug-in solar decision as background, in the same words as ACT's entry, with no approach tag. [9]
  3. 16 Oct 2026 Final review round; removed the SEANZ item and stated the funding gap once in the explain text. [4]
  4. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fifth agent review; reported the export-price gap as what solar owners say and typed the SEANZ figure as an industry claim. [3][2]
  5. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fourth agent review; added the SEANZ cost evidence given to every party. The Spinoff
  6. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after third agent review; restated the biggest tradeoff, made the case for the party's own argument for the pledge (the Jones quote stays in the summary), added the shared officials' evidence and used the no-named-critic form for the case against. [1][4]
  7. 16 Oct 2026 Corrected the description of the Electricity Authority rebate proposal to match its source. [3]
  8. 15 Oct 2026 Revised after agent review; restated the biggest tradeoff, moved a critique of a different proposal out of evidence, removed a speculative cost caveat and the SEANZ label, added the party's rationale and a grid risk. [1][2]
  9. 15 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1][2]

Opportunity

Opportunity would set up a national Ratepayer Assistance Scheme run by local government, offering loans the party describes as low-interest for home electrification, tied to each rateable property. The party says the debt, borrowed through the Local Government Funding Agency, would sit off council and government books. It would also double the Warmer Kiwi Homes programme to about $200 million a year and extend it to solar and electric appliances for low-income households, and co-invest in community-owned generation and storage of up to 15 MW. The party puts the cost of running the loans at about $6 million a year, paid, with the rest of its energy plan, from Crown power company dividends of about $500 million a year. Loan rates, terms and a start date are not published. The biggest tradeoff: the plan uses existing dividends, but that money would no longer be available for other government spending.

Policies: Abundant Energy (Ratepayer Assistance Scheme and Warmer Kiwi Homes expansion)

Who gains

  • Party claimHomeowners who borrow to electrify, low-income households who get solar through Warmer Kiwi Homes, and community energy groups. [1]

Who pays

  • Party claimBorrowers repay the loans. The party says the Warmer Kiwi Homes expansion and loan administration would be paid from Crown dividends from power companies, about $500 million a year. [1]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Party claimAbout $6 million a year to administer the loans and about $200 million a year for the expanded Warmer Kiwi Homes. [1]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Established evidenceRNZ reports that released officials' briefings found upfront cost was the dominant barrier, that uptake was mostly among households able to finance it themselves, and that rebates accelerate uptake; in October 2025 the government chose consenting and technical changes instead. [3]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceInterest rates, loan terms and who qualifies are not specified. [1]
  • Established evidenceThe loans are tied to rateable properties, the party has not said whether renters could use them, and a council scheme depends on councils taking part; low-income households would get help through Warmer Kiwi Homes. [1][7][8]
  • Party claimThe party says the loan debt would sit off council and government books. [1]
  • Established evidenceOfficials flagged Australia's experience of midday solar exports "causing congestion and other network infrastructure upgrade needs"; MBIE-commissioned modelling found network investment would likely be substantial if exports and peak demand are unmanaged, and that active management, including batteries, could substantially reduce it. Opportunity's community co-investment includes storage. [3][4][1]

Implementation

  • Established evidenceA council loan scheme needs a law change and councils choosing to take part; LGNZ expects a council loan scheme could be running 12 to 18 months after the law is changed and councils join. No start date has been given. [1][2][7][8]
  • Party claimThe party says the Warmer Kiwi Homes expansion would be funded from 2028/29. [1]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimOpportunity says the plan is "an investment in lower household bills", and that low-income households "are unlikely to be able to realise its benefits on their own" without help to install solar. [1]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedNo named critic of Opportunity's solar plan was found. More generally, ACT does not support solar subsidies; Simon Court says "if solar stacks up, Kiwis are going to invest without handouts". [5][6]
  1. Opportunity Policy: Abundant Energy (September 2026) · The Opportunity Party · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  2. Council loans for rooftop solar waiting on Govt green light (19 May 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  3. Govt 'kicked the tyres' on solar subsidies but went with 'minor' tweaks (RNZ) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  4. Modelling the impacts of high solar and battery uptake on the electricity market · Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  5. Which political parties would subsidise your rooftop solar panels? (RNZ, 15 April 2026) · RNZ (republished by Now.Solar) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  6. National pledges low-cost loans for solar power (RNZ, 25 June 2026) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  7. Ratepayer Assistance Scheme · Local Government New Zealand · accessed 16 Oct 2026
  8. Council loans for rooftop solar still waiting on government green light (RNZ, 19 May 2026) · RNZ (republished by Now.Solar) · accessed 16 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 17 Oct 2026 Stated the MBIE grid modelling finding as conditionally as the report does, in the same words for every party. [4]
  2. 16 Oct 2026 Final review round; removed the SEANZ item and cited the sources that say councils opt in. [7]
  3. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fifth agent review; added the homeowner-tied loan risk given to every such loan and typed the SEANZ figure as an industry claim; figures and quotes re-checked against the September 2026 policy PDF. [1]
  4. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fourth agent review; removed the comparison with the superseded February 2026 version and a verification caveat no other party had, added the SEANZ cost evidence given to every party, and cited LGNZ's own page for its timing estimate. [1][7]
  5. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after third agent review; attributed the low-interest label, restated the biggest tradeoff, standardised the officials' evidence, split party statements from absences, added the LGNZ timing estimate and used the no-named-critic form for the case against. [1] The Opportunity Party[2]
  6. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after second agent review; attributed the loan running cost and the funding source to the party. [1]
  7. 15 Oct 2026 Revised after agent review; neutral wording for the earlier savings figure, split a party claim from a fact, and added a grid risk. [1]
  8. 15 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1]

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori's 2026 policy manifesto would set up a $1 billion Energy Sovereignty Fund offering grants, concessional finance, guarantees, equity and co-investment, investing in reducing household energy costs, marae and papakāinga resilience, Māori-owned renewable generation, and community batteries and microgrids. It would support access to solar and batteries through "long-term, low-cost and zero-interest finance" and the Ratepayer Assistance Scheme, a council loan model, and would set a "fair-value framework" so households are "properly paid" for power they send back to the grid. Its climate section adds a $1 billion Pūngao Auaha Fund to put solar and insulation on marae, kura, papakāinga and housing. It has not published who would provide the finance, how export payments would be set, a funding source or a start date. The biggest tradeoff: communities would take ownership stakes in energy, but how much of the money would reach individual households is not known.

Who gains

  • Party claimHapū, iwi, marae, Māori landowners and communities taking stakes in energy assets, and households served by community batteries. [4][2]
  • Party claimHouseholds getting low-cost or zero-interest finance for solar and batteries, solar on marae, kura, papakāinga and housing, and households that the party says would be "properly paid" for exported power. [2][3]

Who pays

  • Established evidenceThe party has not said how the $1 billion would be paid for, who would provide the zero-interest finance, or who would pay for higher export payments. [4][1][2]

Cost and costing disputes

  • Party claim$1 billion for the Energy Sovereignty Fund; the climate section also lists a $1 billion Pūngao Auaha Fund. [1][4][2][3]
  • Established evidenceNo timeframe or split between projects has been published, and the manifesto does not say whether the two funds are the same money. [2][3]

Evidence from elsewhere

  • Established evidenceRNZ reports that released officials' briefings found upfront cost was the dominant barrier, that uptake was mostly among households able to finance it themselves, and that rebates accelerate uptake; in October 2025 the government chose consenting and technical changes instead. [6]

Risks and side effects

  • Established evidenceFunding source, split between projects and start date are unpublished. [4][1][2]
  • Established evidenceThe manifesto does not say how a "fair-value" export payment would be worked out. [2]
  • Established evidenceOfficials flagged Australia's experience of midday solar exports "causing congestion and other network infrastructure upgrade needs"; MBIE-commissioned modelling found network investment would likely be substantial if exports and peak demand are unmanaged, and that active management, including batteries, could substantially reduce it. The fund would back community batteries. [6][7][4]

Implementation

  • Established evidenceNo start date has been given. The council loan scheme it supports needs a law change and councils choosing to take part; LGNZ expects a council loan scheme could be running 12 to 18 months after the law is changed and councils join. [4][8][10][11]

Strongest case for

  • Party claimTe Pāti Māori says making it easier for whānau to produce, store and use their own energy would cut their costs, and that those who generate or store power "should be paid fairly for it". [2]

Strongest case against

  • ContestedNo named critic of Te Pāti Māori's solar plan was found. More generally, ACT does not support solar subsidies; Simon Court says "if solar stacks up, Kiwis are going to invest without handouts". [5][9]
  1. Energy Sovereignty · Te Pāti Māori · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  2. Te Pāti Māori Policy Manifesto 2026: Energy Sovereignty (pages 75 to 80) · Te Pāti Māori · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  3. Te Pāti Māori Policy Manifesto 2026: Climate (pages 6 to 8) · Te Pāti Māori · accessed 17 Oct 2026
  4. Te Pāti Māori keen to secure energy sovereignty (RNZ, 16 September 2026) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  5. Which political parties would subsidise your rooftop solar panels? (RNZ, 15 April 2026) · RNZ (republished by Now.Solar) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  6. Govt 'kicked the tyres' on solar subsidies but went with 'minor' tweaks (RNZ) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  7. Modelling the impacts of high solar and battery uptake on the electricity market · Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  8. Council loans for rooftop solar waiting on Govt green light (19 May 2026) · 1News · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  9. National pledges low-cost loans for solar power (RNZ, 25 June 2026) · Otago Daily Times (RNZ) · accessed 15 Oct 2026
  10. Ratepayer Assistance Scheme · Local Government New Zealand · accessed 16 Oct 2026
  11. Council loans for rooftop solar still waiting on government green light (RNZ, 19 May 2026) · RNZ (republished by Now.Solar) · accessed 16 Oct 2026
Change history

Every recorded change to this entry, newest first, including our own corrections after checks.

  1. 17 Oct 2026 Stated the MBIE grid modelling finding as conditionally as the report does, in the same words for every party. [7]
  2. 17 Oct 2026 Read the full energy policy linked from the party's energy page, which could not be opened before. Added its support for low-cost and zero-interest finance, its fair-value framework for exported power and the Pūngao Auaha solar retrofit fund from its climate section, and tagged these the same way as other parties' loans, publicly funded installs and export pricing. [2][3]
  3. 16 Oct 2026 Final review round; removed the SEANZ item. [6]
  4. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fifth agent review; typed the SEANZ figure as an industry claim. The Spinoff
  5. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after fourth agent review; removed the 2023 policy mention so earlier versions are treated the same for every party, added the SEANZ cost evidence given to every party, and cited LGNZ's own page for its timing estimate. [4][10]
  6. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after third agent review; stated the unpublished details once in the summary, restated the biggest tradeoff, removed the SEANZ and Otago sentences, split the party figure from what is unpublished, standardised the officials' evidence, added the LGNZ timing estimate and used the no-named-critic form for the case against. [4][6][9]
  7. 16 Oct 2026 Revised after second agent review; removed the unlinked tax plan from who pays and the case against, moved the Otago survey to dated context, and shortened the SEANZ note. [4][5]
  8. 15 Oct 2026 Revised after agent review; replaced a quote about a different policy in the case against, clarified whose energy plan is meant, and added a grid risk. [4]
  9. 15 Oct 2026 First researched from party and independent sources. [1][4]